Literature DB >> 17007891

An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive.

Angel Borja1, Alf B Josefson, Alison Miles, Iñigo Muxika, Frode Olsgard, Graham Phillips, J Germán Rodríguez, Brage Rygg.   

Abstract

The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) establishes a framework for the protection and improvement of transitional and coastal waters; its final objective is to achieve at least 'good water status' for all waters, by 2015. The WFD requires Member States (MSs) to assess the Ecological Status (ES) of water bodies. This assessment will be based upon the status of the biological, hydromorphological and physico-chemical quality elements, by comparing data obtained from monitoring networks to reference (undisturbed) conditions, and then deriving an Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR). One of the biological quality elements to be considered is the benthic invertebrate component and some structural parameters (composition, diversity and disturbance-sensitive taxa) must be included in the ES assessment. Following these criteria, several approaches to benthic invertebrate assessment have been proposed by MSs. The WFD requires that these approaches are intercalibrated. This contribution describes the comparison of the different methodologies proposed by United Kingdom, Spain, Denmark and Norway. Results show a high consistency between the approaches, both with regard to determining the EQR and boundary settings for the ES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17007891     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  5 in total

1.  Biomonitoring approach with mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lmk) and clam Ruditapes philippinarum (Adams and Reeve, 1850) in the Lagoon of Venice.

Authors:  Vanessa Moschino; Eugenia Delaney; Francesca Meneghetti; Luisa Da Ros
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  The influence of seasonality on biomarker responses in Mytilus edulis.

Authors:  Josephine A Hagger; David Lowe; Awantha Dissanayake; Malcolm B Jones; Tamara S Galloway
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Assessing benthic community condition in Chesapeake Bay: does the use of different benthic indices matter?

Authors:  Roberto J Llansó; Jon H Vølstad; Daniel M Dauer; Jodi R Dew
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Ecological quality status evaluation of a monsoonal tropical estuary using benthic indices: comparison via a seasonal approach.

Authors:  Heidy Q Dias; Soniya Sukumaran; Tatiparthi Srinivas; Jyoti Mulik
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Methodological elements for optimising the spatial monitoring design to support regional benthic ecosystem assessments.

Authors:  Gert Van Hoey; Julia Wischnewski; Johan Craeymeersch; Jennifer Dannheim; Lisette Enserink; Laurent Guerin; Francisco Marco-Rius; Joey O'Connor; Henning Reiss; Anne F Sell; Marie Vanden Berghe; Michael L Zettler; Steven Degraer; Silvana N R Birchenough
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.