Literature DB >> 17007711

Is the promotion of physical activity in vulnerable older people feasible and effective in general practice?

Susie Dinan1, Penny Lenihan, Trish Tenn, Steve Iliffe.   

Abstract

There is convincing evidence about the benefits of exercise training in community dwelling frailer older people, but little evidence that this intervention can be delivered in general practice. In this prospective cohort study in 14 general practices in north London we assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of a tailored exercise referral programme for frail elderly patients delivered within a variety of inner city primary care settings. One hundred and twenty-six women and 32 men aged 75 years and older, deemed borderline frail by their GPs, took part in a two-phase progressive exercise programme (Stage 1--primary care setting; Stage II--leisure/community centre setting) using the Timed Up And Go (TUG) test as the primary outcome measure. Baseline TUG measures confirmed that the participants were borderline frail and that GP selection was accurate. Of those referred by their GP or practice nurse 89% took up the exercise programme; 73% completed Stage I and 63% made the transition to the community Stage II programme. TUG improved in Stage I with a mean difference of 3.5 seconds (P<0.001). An individually tailored progressive exercise programme following GP referral, delivered in weekly group sessions by specialist exercise instructors within general practices, was effective in achieving participation in exercise sessions and in improving TUG values in a significant number of frailer older citizens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17007711      PMCID: PMC1920721     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness and economic evaluation of a nurse delivered home exercise programme to prevent falls. 1: Randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M C Robertson; N Devlin; M M Gardner; A J Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-24

2.  Identifying a cut-off point for normal mobility: a comparison of the timed 'up and go' test in community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly women.

Authors:  Heike A Bischoff; Hannes B Stähelin; Andreas U Monsch; Maura D Iversen; Antje Weyh; Margot von Dechend; Regula Akos; Martin Conzelmann; Walter Dick; Robert Theiler
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.

Authors:  D Podsiadlo; S Richardson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.562

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Family medicine in an aging society.

Authors:  Steve Iliffe
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Frailty: an emerging concept for general practice.

Authors:  Jan De Lepeleire; Steve Iliffe; Eva Mann; Jean Marie Degryse
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Effectiveness of exercise-referral schemes to promote physical activity in adults: systematic review.

Authors:  Nefyn H Williams; Maggie Hendry; Barbara France; Ruth Lewis; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Instructors' Perceptions of Mostly Seated Exercise Classes: Exploring the Concept of Chair Based Exercise.

Authors:  Katie R Robinson; Tahir Masud; Helen Hawley-Hague
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Physical activity on prescription schemes (PARS): do programme characteristics influence effectiveness? Results of a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Jelena Arsenijevic; Wim Groot
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Multi-centre cluster randomised trial comparing a community group exercise programme with home based exercise with usual care for people aged 65 and over in primary care: protocol of the ProAct 65+ trial.

Authors:  Steve Iliffe; Denise Kendrick; Richard Morris; Dawn Skelton; Heather Gage; Susie Dinan; Zoe Stevens; Mirilee Pearl; Tahir Masud
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Functionality of Physical Activity Referral Schemes (PARS): A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francis Ali Albert; Melissa J Crowe; Aduli E O Malau-Aduli; Bunmi S Malau-Aduli
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-06-25

Review 8.  What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review.

Authors:  Kerryn Husk; Kelly Blockley; Rebecca Lovell; Alison Bethel; Iain Lang; Richard Byng; Ruth Garside
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2019-09-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.