Literature DB >> 17007343

The management of wounds following primary lower limb arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised study comparing hydrofibre and central pad dressings.

Tarek M Abuzakuk1, Pamela Coward, Y Shenava, V Senthil Kumar, John A Skinner.   

Abstract

Wound care following lower limb arthroplasty has not been subject to in-depth clinical research, primarily because such wounds usually heal without complication. However, when prosthetic implants are used, serious wound problems can be disastrous (Whitehouse et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:183-9; Lindwell OM. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;211:91-103). We report the results of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing a hydrofibre (Aquacel) and central pad (Mepore) dressing in the management of acute wounds following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty left to heal by primary intention. Dressing performance was measured in 61 patients receiving total hip or knee replacements. There was a significant reduction in the requirement for dressing changes before five postoperative days in the hydrofibre group (43% compared with 77% in the central pad group), and there were fewer blisters amongst patients in the hydrofibre group (13% compared with 26% in the central pad group). We conclude that there is a potential role for hydrofibre dressing in the management of arthroplasty wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17007343      PMCID: PMC7951503          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2006.00189.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  10 in total

Review 1.  An investigation of the benefits of Aquacel Hydrofibre wound dressing.

Authors:  C Williams
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  1999 May 27-Jun 9

2.  Postoperative wound blistering: is there a link with dressing usage?

Authors:  S K Gupta; S Lee; L G Moseley
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.072

3.  Wound dressings and airborne dispersal of bacteria.

Authors:  J C Lawrence; H A Lilly; A Kidson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Clean air at operation and subsequent sepsis in the joint.

Authors:  O M Lidwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost.

Authors:  James D Whitehouse; N Deborah Friedman; Kathryn B Kirkland; William J Richardson; Daniel J Sexton
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  The application of a cellulose-based fibre dressing in surgical wounds.

Authors:  L Foster; P Moore
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  Cost benefits of two dressings in the management of surgical wounds.

Authors:  P J Moore; L Foster
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2000 Sep 28-Oct 11

8.  A histological comparison of acute inflammatory responses with a hydrofibre or tulle gauze dressing.

Authors:  M J Hoekstra; M H E Hermans; C D Richters; R P Dutrieux
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.072

9.  A comparison of hydrofibre and alginate dressings on open acute surgical wounds.

Authors:  L Foster; P Moore; S Clark
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.072

10.  Wound blisters post hip surgery: a prospective trial comparing dressings.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Michael P Falkenberg; Marinis Pirpiris
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.872

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  In search of the optimal wound dressing material following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Sang Wook Lee; Oliver Atanacio; Javad Parvizi; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Development of a simple multidisciplinary arthroplasty wound-assessment instrument: the SMArt Wound Tool

Authors:  Sahil Singh Kooner; Brendan Sheehan; Joseph Keith Kendal; Herman Johal
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Randomized controlled trial of conventional versus modern surgical dressings following primary total hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  Jean Langlois; Amine Zaoui; Camille Ozil; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Philippe Anract; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Wound dressings for primary and revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Madhav Chowdhry; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-10

5.  Reduced short-term complications and mortality following Enhanced Recovery primary hip and knee arthroplasty: results from 6,000 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Sameer K Khan; Ajay Malviya; Scott D Muller; Ian Carluke; Paul F Partington; Kevin P Emmerson; Mike R Reed
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  The Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Authors:  Fatih Küçükdurmaz; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-11-30

7.  Open-label randomized controlled trial to compare wound dressings for patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maria López-Parra; Dolors Gil-Rey; Esmeralda López-González; Eva-Maria González-Rodríguez; Isabel Simó-Sánchez; Francisco Zamora-Carmona; Lidia Roqueta-Andreu; Marta Arizu-Puigvert; Dolors Abril-Sabater; Àngels Moreno-Álvarez; Àngels López-Bonet; Gisela López-Hidalgo; Helena Costa-Ventura; Laura García-Pardo; Mireia Rico-Liberato; Miriam García-Borràs; Maria Teresa Arnal-Leris; Mònica Sianes-Gallén; Roser Vives
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.