Literature DB >> 17006431

[First abdominal access in gynecological laparoscopy: which method to utilize?].

A Tinelli1, A Malvasi, A J Schneider, J Keckstein, G Hudelist, M Barbic, S Casciaro, G Giorda, R Tinelli, A Perrone, F G Tinelli.   

Abstract

The choice of the technique to enter the peritoneal cavity, during a laparoscopy, depends on a lot of variables which hinder a standardized method and, actually, it appears impossible to show, with certainty, the best method to choose for the first abdominal access in gynecological laparoscopy. The preference for one or another technique depends on the operator experience, school and speciality of the surgeon, laparoscopical upgrading and the work environment; many surgical techniques are not yet used due the limits and fears of some surgeons to change the preference in first access approaching and for the lack of operating versatility by a method or another one. A review of the scientific literature, underlines that the major problems during the first laparoscopical abdominal access are two, vascular and intestinal and their percentage is variable. In this paper we describe the large range of methods for open and closed laparoscopy and for direct access, that permit to perform a first abdominal laparoscopical access, and their major possible problems.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17006431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Ginecol        ISSN: 0026-4784


  4 in total

1.  Theranostic applications: Non-ionizing cellular and molecular imaging through innovative nanosystems for early diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-28

2.  Laparoscopy and natural orifice surgery: first entry safety surveillance step.

Authors:  Daniel A Tsin; Andrea Tinelli; Antonio Malvasi; Fausto Davila; Ramiro Jesus; Raul Castro-Perez
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Bladeless direct optical trocar insertion in laparoscopic procedures on the obese patient.

Authors:  Andrea Tinelli; Antonio Malvasi; Ospan A Mynbaev; Daniel Alberto Tsin; Fausto Davila; Guillermo Dominguez; Emanuele Perrone; Farr R Nezhat
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Automatic evaluation of progression angle and fetal head station through intrapartum echographic monitoring.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Ernesto Casciaro; Giulia Soloperto; Emanuele Perrone; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Antonio Perrone
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.238

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.