Literature DB >> 17006368

The potential for bone loss in acetabular structures following THA.

Michael T Manley1, Kevin L Ong, Steven M Kurtz.   

Abstract

Attempts to preserve periacetabular bone stock following total hip replacement have largely ignored the potential for stress shielding in the acetabulum. We sought to quantify the change in stress distribution in acetabular bone with components of varying material stiffness by developing a high-resolution 3-D finite element model from CT scans of a young female donor. Periprosthetic bone stresses and strains on the left pelvis were compared with hemispherical cups of various material properties and with a horseshoe shaped polymeric design described in the recent literature. We observed unphysiologic periacetabular bone stress and strain fields for all designs tested. For hemispherical components, reduction of the acetabular shell material modulus caused modest changes in bone stress compared to the changes in implant geometry. The horseshoe shaped cup more effectively loaded the acetabular structures than the hemispherical design. Our results suggest stress and strain fields in pelvic structures after introduction of hemispherical acetabular components predict inevitable bone adaptation that can not be resolved by changes in implant material properties alone. Radical changes in implant design may be necessary for long-term maintenance of supporting structures in the reconstructed acetabulum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17006368     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238855.54239.fd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  The development of a scanning strategy for the manufacture of porous biomaterials by selective laser melting.

Authors:  R Stamp; P Fox; W O'Neill; E Jones; C Sutcliffe
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  New alternate bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty: A review of the current literature.

Authors:  Preston W Grieco; Scott Pascal; Jared M Newman; Neil V Shah; Sarah G Stroud; Neil P Sheth; Aditya V Maheshwari
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-10-27

Review 3.  Bearing surfaces in hip replacement - Evolution and likely future.

Authors:  Narinder Kumar; Gen N C Arora; Barun Datta
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-08-04

Review 4.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; John N Devine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Genetic-Based Optimization of 3D Burch-Schneider Cage With Functionally Graded Lattice Material.

Authors:  Manman Xu; Yan Zhang; Shuting Wang; Guozhang Jiang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-26

6.  Comparison of early migration patterns between a ceramic and polyethylene liner in uncemented Trabecular Titanium cups: a 2-year randomized controlled trial of 52 hips using radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  Amanda D Klaassen; Elisabeth A Schäffer; Nienke W Willigenburg; Loes W A H Van Beers; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Victor P M Van der Hulst; Lennard A Koster; Bart L Kaptein; Dirk Jan F Moojen; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.925

7.  Peri-acetabular bone mineral densityin total hip replacement.

Authors:  L Gauthier; L Dinh; P E Beaulé
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  Finite element stress analysis of the bearing component and bone resected surfaces for total ankle replacement with different implant material combinations.

Authors:  Jian Yu; Dahang Zhao; Wen-Ming Chen; Pengfei Chu; Shuo Wang; Chao Zhang; Jiazhang Huang; Xu Wang; Xin Ma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.