Literature DB >> 17005774

Sympathetic skin response: monitoring of CT-guided lumbar sympathetic blocks.

Marius R Schmid1, Rudolf O Kissling, Armin Curt, Gabriel Jaschko, Juerg Hodler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate accuracy of sympathetic skin response (SSR) for monitoring computed tomography (CT)-guided lumbar sympathetic blocks, with palpable temperature increase in the foot 30 minutes after injection serving as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Seventy individual lumbar sympathetic blocks were performed in 13 patients (six female, seven male; mean age, 45 years) with reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the foot. A 22-gauge needle was advanced to the sympathetic trunk at midlumbar level with CT fluoroscopic guidance, and 1 mL of iopamidol (200 mg of iodine per milliliter) and 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine were injected. SSR was monitored in both feet before and after bupivacaine injection. SSRs were activated with painless low-strength (5-20-mA) electrical stimuli. SSR ratio (SSR in the injected foot versus SSR in the contralateral foot) was calculated before injection and repeatedly at 1-minute intervals thereafter. Needle tip position and distribution of bupivacaine were measured on CT images. Receiver operating characteristic curves for SSR ratio were calculated until 7 minutes after injection. Logistic regression analyses adjusted for clustering were calculated for SSR ratio, injection parameters, needle tip position, and bupivacaine distribution.
RESULTS: Thirty minutes after injection, 83% of procedures were considered clinically successful. An SSR cutoff ratio of 1:10 was used, and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SSR for prediction of clinical success were 84%, 92%, and 86%, respectively, 4 minutes after injection and 95%, 92%, and 94%, respectively, 7 minutes after injection. Needle tip position (P = .19), medial and lateral borders of bupivacaine distribution (P = .11 and .056), and distance between bupivacaine distribution and the vertebral body (P = .41) were not significantly different between successful and unsuccessful injections.
CONCLUSION: SSR can be used to correctly identify needle tip position in lumbar sympathetic blocks 6 and 7 minutes after injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005774     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2412051229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  1.5 T augmented reality navigated interventional MRI: paravertebral sympathetic plexus injections.

Authors:  David R Marker; Paweena U Thainual; Tamas Ungi; Aaron J Flammang; Gabor Fichtinger; Iulian I Iordachita; John A Carrino; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  The lumbar sympathetic trunk: its visibility and distance to two anatomical landmarks.

Authors:  Georg C Feigl; Manuel Kastner; Heimo Ulz; Christian Breschan; Thomas Pixner; Manuel Dreu; Heinz W Umschaden; Rudolf Likar
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Lumbar sympathetic treatment in the management of lower limb pain.

Authors:  Ronnen Abramov
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-04

4.  Lumbar sympathetic blockade in children with complex regional pain syndromes: a double blind placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  Petra M Meier; David Zurakowski; Charles B Berde; Navil F Sethna
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Comparison of Multilevel with Single Level Injection during Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block: Efficacy of Sympatholysis and Incidence of Psoas Muscle Injection.

Authors:  Ji Hee Hong; Min Ju Oh
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2010-05-31

6.  Approach-related lesions of the sympathetic chain in anterior correction and instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Bastian Mester; Denise Oberdiek; Nani Osada; Ulf Liljenqvist; Timm J Filler; Martin Marziniak; Viola Bullmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Lumbar sympathicolysis in patients with severe peripheral artery disease: hemodynamics of the lower limbs determined by near-infrared spectroscopy, color coded duplex sonography, and temperature measurement.

Authors:  Ingmar Bombor; Christian Wissgott; Reimer Andresen
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-10

Review 8.  Ganglion blocks as a treatment of pain: current perspectives.

Authors:  Osman Hakan Gunduz; Ozge Kenis-Coskun
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Change in pulse transit time in the lower extremity after lumbar sympathetic ganglion block: an early indicator of successful block.

Authors:  Eun-Young Joo; Yu Gyeong Kong; Jonghyuk Lee; Hyun-Seok Cho; Sung-Hoon Kim; Jeong Hun Suh
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 1.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.