Literature DB >> 17005769

Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?

Kenjirou Ohashi1, Georges Y El-Khoury, Khalil W Abu-Zahra, Kevin S Berbaum.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with radiography alone and multidetector computed tomography (CT) alone and to retrospectively assess whether standard Judet views lead to a change in the classification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained; informed consent was not required for this HIPAA-compliant study, which included 101 imaging studies performed in 99 patients (78 male, 21 female; mean age, 43 years; age range, 15-86 years) with acetabular fractures. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently classified the fractures with radiography alone and multidetector CT alone. Multiplanar reformatted and three-dimensional (3D) CT images were reviewed at a computer workstation. Readers were shown radiographs at the end of multidetector CT image reading to see if this would change the multidetector CT-based classification. kappa Values were calculated to assess interobserver agreement. For surgically treated patients, the McNemar test was used to compare the accuracy of readers' classifications. The reference standard was a combination of preoperative radiographic and multidetector CT image findings and intraoperative findings.
RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.42) with radiography and substantial (kappa = 0.70) with multidetector CT. Multidetector CT classification was changed in two cases (one case for each reader) after standard Judet views were added. In 73 surgically treated patients, agreement with the surgeons' classification was higher with multidetector CT than with radiography (P < .01 for one reader, P = .06 for the other reader).
CONCLUSION: There is substantial interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multiplanar reformatted and 3D multidetector CT images. Standard Judet pelvic radiographs add little information for changing the multidetector CT classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005769     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2412050960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

1.  Classifications in brief: Letournel classification for acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Timothy B Alton; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?

Authors:  Lars Brouwers; Albert F Pull Ter Gunne; Mariska A de Jongh; Thomas J J Maal; Rinaldo Vreeken; Frank H W M van der Heijden; Luke P H Leenen; Willem R Spanjersberg; Sven H van Helden; Diederik O Verbeek; Mike Bemelman; Koen W W Lansink
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-17

Review 3.  MDCT in the evaluation of skeletal trauma: principles, protocols, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Mats Geijer; Georges Y El-Khoury
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-08-24

4.  An interactive surgical planning tool for acetabular fractures: initial results.

Authors:  Jürgen Fornaro; Marius Keel; Matthias Harders; Borut Marincek; Gábor Székely; Thomas Frauenfelder
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  CT-generated radiographs in obese patients with acetabular fractures: can they be used in lieu of plain radiographs?

Authors:  Philip M Sinatra; Berton R Moed
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional computed tomographies in the classification of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Thanat Kanthawang; Tanawat Vaseenon; Patumrat Sripan; Nuttaya Pattamapaspong
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02

7.  Standardized three dimensional computerised tomography scanner reconstructions increase the accuracy of acetabular fracture classification.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Guillaume Riouallon; Mourad Zaraa; Peter Upex; Véronique Marteau; Pomme Jouffroy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The study of broken quadrilateral surface in fractures of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Thavat Prasartritha; Paskorn Chaivanichsiri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Imaging of the acetabulum in the era of multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Mats Geijer; Georges Y El-Khoury
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2007-06-23

10.  [CT-based classification aid for acetabular fractures: evaluation and clinical testing].

Authors:  A Schäffler; F Fensky; D Knöschke; N P Haas; A G Becken; U Stöckle; B König
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.