Literature DB >> 17005634

Relative oral bioavailability of arsenic from contaminated soils measured in the cynomolgus monkey.

Stephen M Roberts1, John W Munson, Yvette W Lowney, Michael V Ruby.   

Abstract

A number of studies have found that gastrointestinal absorption of arsenic from soil is limited, indicating that a relative oral bioavailability (RBA) adjustment is warranted when calculating risks from exposure to arsenic-contaminated soil. However, few studies of arsenic bioavailability from soil have been conducted in animal models with phylogenetic similarity to humans, such as nonhuman primates. We report here the results of a study in which the RBA of arsenic in soil from a variety of types of contaminated sites was measured in male cynomolgus monkeys. A single oral dose of each contaminated soil was administered to five adult male cynomolgus monkeys by gavage, and the extent of oral absorption was evaluated through measurement of arsenic recovery in urine and feces. Urinary recovery of arsenic following doses of contaminated soil was compared with urinary recovery following oral administration of sodium arsenate in water in order to determine the RBA of each soil. RBA of arsenic in 14 soil samples from 12 different sites ranged from 0.05 to 0.31 (5-31%), with most RBA values in the 0.1-0.2 (10-20%) range. The RBA values were found to be inversely related to the amount of arsenic present with iron sulfate. No other significant correlations were observed between RBA and arsenic mineralogic phases in the test soils. The lack of clear relationships between arsenic mineralogy and RBA measured in vivo suggests that gastrointestinal absorption of arsenic from soil may be more complex than originally thought, and subject to factors other than simple dissolution behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005634     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  8 in total

1.  Lead availability in soils from Portugal's Centre Region with special reference to bioaccessibility.

Authors:  C Patinha; A P Reis; C Dias; A Cachada; R Adão; H Martins; E Ferreira da Silva; A J Sousa
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Lead and Arsenic Bioaccessibility and Speciation as a Function of Soil Particle Size.

Authors:  Ranju R Karna; Matt Noerpel; Aaron R Betts; Kirk G Scheckel
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  Evaluating the mouse model for estimation of arsenic bioavailability: Comparison of estimates of absolute bioavailability of inorganic arsenic in mouse, humans, and other species.

Authors:  Gary L Diamond; David J Thomas; Karen D Bradham
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2022-07-05

4.  Modification of an existing in vitro method to predict relative bioavailable arsenic in soils.

Authors:  Shane Whitacre; Nicholas Basta; Brooke Stevens; Valerie Hanley; Richard Anderson; Kirk Scheckel
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  In vitro evaluation of ferrihydrite as an enterosorbent for arsenic from contaminated drinking water.

Authors:  J F Taylor; A Robinson; N Johnson; A Marroquin-Cardona; B Brattin; R Taylor; T D Phillips
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Relative bioavailability and bioaccessibility and speciation of arsenic in contaminated soils.

Authors:  Karen D Bradham; Kirk G Scheckel; Clay M Nelson; Paul E Seales; Grace E Lee; Michael F Hughes; Bradley W Miller; Aaron Yeow; Thomas Gilmore; Sophia M Serda; Sharon Harper; David J Thomas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Natural Background and Anthropogenic Arsenic Enrichment in Florida Soils, Surface Water, and Groundwater: A Review with a Discussion on Public Health Risk.

Authors:  Thomas M Missimer; Christopher M Teaf; William T Beeson; Robert G Maliva; John Woolschlager; Douglas J Covert
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  In vivo and in vitro methods for evaluating soil arsenic bioavailability: relevant to human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Karen D Bradham; Gary L Diamond; Michele Burgess; Albert Juhasz; Julie M Klotzbach; Mark Maddaloni; Clay Nelson; Kirk Scheckel; Sophia M Serda; Marc Stifelman; David J Thomas
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 8.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.