AIMS: Efficacy and safety of a short-duration treatment of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus oral azithromycin to treat active trachoma. METHODS: Randomised, controlled, double-masked, double-dummy, non-inferiority explanatory study including 670 children from Guinea Conakry and Pakistan if: 1-10 years old; active trachoma (TF+TI0 or TF+TI+ on simplified World Health Organisation (WHO) scale). Three groups received either: azithromycin 1.5% eye drops twice daily for 2 days, for 3 days or azithromycin single 20 mg/kg oral dose. Patients' contacts were treated whenever possible. Clinical evaluation was performed using a binocular loupe. Primary efficacy variable was the cure (no active trachoma (TF0)) at day 60. Non-inferiority margin for difference between cure rates was 10%. RESULTS:Cure rate in per protocol set was as follows: 93.0%, 96.3% and 96.6% in 2-day group 3-day group, and oral treatment group, respectively. Azithromycin 1.5% groups were non-inferior to oral azithromycin. The intend to treat (ITT) analysis supported the results. Clinical re-emergence rate was low: 4.2%. Ocular tolerance was similar for all groups. No treatment related adverse events were reported. Logistic regression analyses found prognostic factors such as: country (p<0.001) and trachoma severity (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In active trachoma, azithromycin eye drops twice daily for 2 or 3 days are as efficient as the WHO's reference treatment and represent an innovative alternative to oral azithromycin.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Efficacy and safety of a short-duration treatment of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus oral azithromycin to treat active trachoma. METHODS: Randomised, controlled, double-masked, double-dummy, non-inferiority explanatory study including 670 children from Guinea Conakry and Pakistan if: 1-10 years old; active trachoma (TF+TI0 or TF+TI+ on simplified World Health Organisation (WHO) scale). Three groups received either: azithromycin 1.5% eye drops twice daily for 2 days, for 3 days or azithromycin single 20 mg/kg oral dose. Patients' contacts were treated whenever possible. Clinical evaluation was performed using a binocular loupe. Primary efficacy variable was the cure (no active trachoma (TF0)) at day 60. Non-inferiority margin for difference between cure rates was 10%. RESULTS: Cure rate in per protocol set was as follows: 93.0%, 96.3% and 96.6% in 2-day group 3-day group, and oral treatment group, respectively. Azithromycin 1.5% groups were non-inferior to oral azithromycin. The intend to treat (ITT) analysis supported the results. Clinical re-emergence rate was low: 4.2%. Ocular tolerance was similar for all groups. No treatment related adverse events were reported. Logistic regression analyses found prognostic factors such as: country (p<0.001) and trachoma severity (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In active trachoma, azithromycin eye drops twice daily for 2 or 3 days are as efficient as the WHO's reference treatment and represent an innovative alternative to oral azithromycin.
Authors: K C Chern; S K Shrestha; V Cevallos; H L Dhami; P Tiwari; L Chern; J P Whitcher; T M Lietman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: S O Holm; H C Jha; R C Bhatta; J S Chaudhary; B B Thapa; D Davis; R P Pokhrel; M Yinghui; M Zegans; J Schachter; K D Frick; L Tapert; T M Lietman Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2003-07-07 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: R J Bowman; A Sillah; C Van Dehn; V M Goode; M M Muqit; M Muquit; G J Johnson; P Milligan; J Rowley; H Faal; R L Bailey Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: R Wilson; R Kubin; I Ballin; K M Deppermann; H P Bassaris; P Leophonte; A J Schreurs; A Torres; B Sommerauer Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Berhan Ayele; Teshome Gebre; Jenafir I House; Zhaoxia Zhou; Charles E McCulloch; Travis C Porco; Bruce D Gaynor; Paul M Emerson; Thomas M Lietman; Jeremy D Keenan Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Paola Pansa; Yingfen Hsia; Julia Bielicki; Irja Lutsar; A Sarah Walker; Mike Sharland; Laura Folgori Journal: Drugs Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 9.546