BACKGROUND: Chronic utilization of a bio-incompatible peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution with acidic pH and a high content of glucose degradation product (GDP) has been implicated as a contributing cause of peritoneal failure. We compared a newly formulated solution of neutral pH and low levels of GDP to a standard PD solution. METHODS:Fifty new PD patients were randomized to a conventional lactate-buffered fluid (control) and a pH neutral, lactate-buffered, low GDP solution (balance). Patients were followed for 12 months. Serum samples were assayed for C-reactive protein (CRP). PD effluent was collected and assayed for cancer antigen-125 (CA125) and hyaluronan (HA). Clinical end points were the residual renal function and dialysis adequacy indices. RESULTS: After 52 weeks of treatment, PD fluid CA125 rose from 2.45 +/- 0.96 to 14.30 +/- 2.17 U/ml (P < 0.001), and HA declined from 2.26 +/- 0.60 to 1.45 +/- 0.32 mug/ml (P = 0.07) in the balance group. The balance group had a higher PD fluid CA-125 (14.30 +/- 2.17 vs 7.36 +/- 2.23 U/ml, P = 0.007), lower HA (1.45 +/- 0.32 vs 2.55 +/- 0.32 mug/ml, P = 0.007), and lower serum CRP level (1.77 +/- 0.42 vs 7.73 +/- 2.42 mg/l, P = 0.026) than the control group at 52 weeks. There was no difference in dialysis adequacy indices, ultrafiltration volume, urine output, residual renal function, peritonitis rate or need of hospitalization in 1 year. CONCLUSION: As compared to conventional PD solution, the use of balance, a neutral pH, low GDP solution resulted in a superior profile of PDE mesothelial cell marker and a lower degree of systemic inflammation, and the difference was maintained for 1 year. It remains to be determined whether these effects could result in better long-term clinical outcome.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Chronic utilization of a bio-incompatible peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution with acidic pH and a high content of glucose degradation product (GDP) has been implicated as a contributing cause of peritoneal failure. We compared a newly formulated solution of neutral pH and low levels of GDP to a standard PD solution. METHODS: Fifty new PDpatients were randomized to a conventional lactate-buffered fluid (control) and a pH neutral, lactate-buffered, low GDP solution (balance). Patients were followed for 12 months. Serum samples were assayed for C-reactive protein (CRP). PD effluent was collected and assayed for cancer antigen-125 (CA125) and hyaluronan (HA). Clinical end points were the residual renal function and dialysis adequacy indices. RESULTS: After 52 weeks of treatment, PD fluid CA125 rose from 2.45 +/- 0.96 to 14.30 +/- 2.17 U/ml (P < 0.001), and HA declined from 2.26 +/- 0.60 to 1.45 +/- 0.32 mug/ml (P = 0.07) in the balance group. The balance group had a higher PD fluid CA-125 (14.30 +/- 2.17 vs 7.36 +/- 2.23 U/ml, P = 0.007), lower HA (1.45 +/- 0.32 vs 2.55 +/- 0.32 mug/ml, P = 0.007), and lower serum CRP level (1.77 +/- 0.42 vs 7.73 +/- 2.42 mg/l, P = 0.026) than the control group at 52 weeks. There was no difference in dialysis adequacy indices, ultrafiltration volume, urine output, residual renal function, peritonitis rate or need of hospitalization in 1 year. CONCLUSION: As compared to conventional PD solution, the use of balance, a neutral pH, low GDP solution resulted in a superior profile of PDE mesothelial cell marker and a lower degree of systemic inflammation, and the difference was maintained for 1 year. It remains to be determined whether these effects could result in better long-term clinical outcome.
Authors: Susan Yung; Sing Leung Lui; Chris K F Ng; Andrew Yim; Maggie K M Ma; Kin Yee Lo; Chik Cheung Chow; Kwok Hong Chu; Wai Leung Chak; Man Fai Lam; Chun Yu Yung; Terence P S Yip; Sunny Wong; Colin S O Tang; Flora S K Ng; Tak Mao Chan Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Seychelle Yohanna; Ali M A Alkatheeri; Scott K Brimble; Brendan McCormick; Arthur Iansavitchous; Peter G Blake; Arsh K Jain Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: David W Johnson; Fiona G Brown; Margaret Clarke; Neil Boudville; Tony J Elias; Marjorie W Y Foo; Bernard Jones; Hemant Kulkarni; Robyn Langham; Dwarakanathan Ranganathan; John Schollum; Michael Suranyi; Seng H Tan; David Voss Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Monika Lichodziejewska-Niemierko; Michał Chmielewski; Maria Dudziak; Alicja Ryta; Bolesław Rutkowski Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 1.756