Literature DB >> 17005514

Variation of mesorectal volume with abdominal fat volume in patients with rectal carcinoma: assessment with MRI.

S D Allen1, V Gada, D M Blunt.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the variability in the volume of the mesorectum in patients with rectal carcinoma. A retrospective review was made of pelvic MRI studies in 30 patients (mean age 64 years, range 34-88 years, 18M:12F) with histologically proven rectal carcinomas that were confined to the mesorectum. The outer low signal margin of the mesorectum was traced, over at least 10 consecutive 10 mm contiguous slices, until its disappearance. The visceral fascial compartment, body cross-sectional area and body mass index were measured, on a solitary slice, at the level of the L5/S1 disc. Linear regression was calculated for independent determinants of the mesorectal volume. Mean mesorectal volume in males was 227.5 cm3 (95%CI 191.6-263.4), and in females was 157.5 cm3 (95%CI 129.3-185.7). The difference in mesorectal volume between men and women was statistically significant (p<0.001). Mean visceral compartment area in males was 18.4 cm2 (95%CI 16.3-20.5) and in females was 14.6 cm2 (95%CI 12.8-16.4). Visceral compartment area correlated with mesorectal area and volume in females (p<0.05), and extremely well in males (p<0.005). Body cross-sectional area, body mass index and age did not correlate with mesorectal size. The correlation of visceral compartment area with mesorectal volume and mean area suggests that the mesorectum is determined in a similar way to other body fat compartments, with a similar anatomical variation. This significant variation in size and volume may have an important prognostic implication in patients with rectal carcinoma. This volume can be measured and reported on pre-operative MRI scanning and may be communicated to surgeons and radiotherapists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005514     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/66311683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  6 in total

1.  Pelvic inlet shape measured by three-dimensional pelvimetry is a predictor of the operative time in the anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Takehiro Shimada; Masashi Tsuruta; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Koji Okabayashi; Takashi Ishida; Yusuke Asada; Hirofumi Suzumura; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Posterior mesorectal thickness as a predictor of increased operative time in rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tyler McKechnie; Karim Ramji; Colin Kruse; Hussein Jaffer; Ryan Rebello; Nalin Amin; Aristithes G Doumouras; Dennis Hong; Cagla Eskicioglu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  T3 subclassification using the EMD/mesorectum ratio predicts neoadjuvant chemoradiation outcome in T3 rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Lijun Shen; Yiqun Sun; Hui Zhang; Jing Zhang; Weijuan Deng; Yaqi Wang; Ye Yao; Lifeng Yang; Ji Zhu; Tong Tong; Liping Liang; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Quantitative assessment of mesorectal fat: new prognostic biomarker in patients with mid-to-lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jiyoung Yoon; Yong Eun Chung; Joon Seok Lim; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal ultrasound for diagnosis of rectal lesions.

Authors:  Franciszek Burdan; Iwona Sudol-Szopinska; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Malgorzata Kolodziejczak; Robert Klepacz; Agnieszka Mocarska; Marek Caban; Iwonna Zelazowska-Cieslinska; Justyna Szumilo
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.175

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.