Literature DB >> 17005415

Dehydration versus deamination of N-terminal glutamine in collision-induced dissociation of protonated peptides.

Pedatsur Neta1, Quan-Long Pu, Lisa Kilpatrick, Xiaoyu Yang, Stephen E Stein.   

Abstract

Some of the most prominent "neutral losses" in peptide ion fragmentation are the loss of ammonia and water from N-terminal glutamine. These processes are studied by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in singly- and doubly-protonated peptide ions undergoing collision-induced dissociation in a triple quadrupole and in an ion trap instrument. For this study, four sets of peptides were synthesized: (1) QLLLPLLLK and similar peptides with K replaced by R, H, or L, and Q replaced by a number of amino acids, (2) QLnK (n = 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11), (3) QLnR (n = 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9), and (4) QLn (n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 8). The results for QLLLPLLLK and QLLLPLLLR show that the singly protonated ions undergo loss of ammonia and to a smaller extent loss of water, whereas the doubly protonated ions undergo predominant loss of water. The fast fragmentation next to P (forming the y5 ion) occurs to a larger extent than the neutral losses from the singly protonated ions but much less than the water loss from the doubly protonated ions. The results from these and other peptides show that, in general, when N-terminal glutamine peptides have no "mobile protons", that is, the number of charges on the peptide is no greater than the number of basic amino acids (K, R, H), deamination is the predominant neutral loss fragmentation, but when mobile protons are present the predominant process is the loss of water. Both of these processes are faster than backbone fragmentation at the proline. These results are rationalized on the basis of resonance stabilization of the two types of five-membered ring products that would be formed in the neutral loss processes; the singly protonated ion yields the more stable neutral pyrrolidinone ring whereas the doubly protonated ion yields the protonated aminopyrroline ring (see Schemes). The generality of these trends is confirmed by analyzing an MS/MS spectra library of peptides derived from tryptic digests of yeast. In the absence of mobile protons, glutamine deamination is the most rapid neutral loss process. For peptides with mobile protons, dehydration from glutamine is far more rapid than from any other amino acid. Most strikingly, end terminal glutamine is by far the most labile source of neutral loss in excess-proton peptides, but not highly exceptional when mobile protons are not available. In addition, rates of deamination are faster in lysine versus arginine C-terminus peptides and 20 times faster in positively charged than negatively charged peptides, demonstrating that these formal neutral loss reactions are not "neutral reactions" but depend on charge state and stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005415     DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  11 in total

Review 1.  Five-membered ring formation in unimolecular reactions of peptides: a key structural element controlling low-energy collision-induced dissociation of peptides.

Authors:  A Schlosser; W D Lehmann
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.982

2.  The role of nucleophile--electrophile interactions in the unimolecular and bimolecular gas-phase ion chemistry of peptides and related systems.

Authors:  R A O'Hair
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.982

Review 3.  Fragmentation pathways of protonated peptides.

Authors:  Béla Paizs; Sándor Suhai
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Mining a tandem mass spectrometry database to determine the trends and global factors influencing peptide fragmentation.

Authors:  Eugene A Kapp; Frédéric Schütz; Gavin E Reid; James S Eddes; Robert L Moritz; Richard A J O'Hair; Terence P Speed; Richard J Simpson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Statistical characterization of the charge state and residue dependence of low-energy CID peptide dissociation patterns.

Authors:  Yingying Huang; Joseph M Triscari; George C Tseng; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic; Mary S Lipton; Richard D Smith; Vicki H Wysocki
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Mobile and localized protons: a framework for understanding peptide dissociation.

Authors:  V H Wysocki; G Tsaprailis; L L Smith; L A Breci
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.982

7.  Dissociation of the peptide bond in protonated peptides.

Authors:  M J Polce; D Ren; C Wesdemiotis
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.982

8.  Fragmentation of protonated oligoalanines: amide bond cleavage and beyond.

Authors:  Alex G Harrison; Alex B Young
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Cyclization of N-terminal S-carbamoylmethylcysteine causing loss of 17 Da from peptides and extra peaks in peptide maps.

Authors:  Kieran F Geoghegan; Lise R Hoth; Douglas H Tan; Kris A Borzilleri; Jane M Withka; James G Boyd
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Fragmentation reactions of protonated peptides containing glutamine or glutamic acid.

Authors:  Alex G Harrison
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.982

View more
  17 in total

1.  Formation of y + 10 and y + 11 ions in the collision-induced dissociation of peptide ions.

Authors:  Lisa E Kilpatrick; Pedatsur Neta; Xiaoyu Yang; Yamil Simón-Manso; Yuxue Liang; Stephen E Stein
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Occurrence of C-terminal residue exclusion in peptide fragmentation by ESI and MALDI tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mathieu Dupré; Sonia Cantel; Jean Martinez; Christine Enjalbal
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Effect of N-terminal glutamic acid and glutamine on fragmentation of peptide ions.

Authors:  Bhaskar Godugu; Pedatsur Neta; Yamil Simón-Manso; Stephen E Stein
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Sequence elucidation of an unknown cyclic peptide of high doping potential by ETD and CID tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Fuyu Guan; Cornelius E Uboh; Lawrence R Soma; Jeffrey Rudy
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 5.  Optimized approaches for quantification of drug transporters in tissues and cells by MRM proteomics.

Authors:  Bhagwat Prasad; Jashvant D Unadkat
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Intact Transition Epitope Mapping (ITEM).

Authors:  Yelena Yefremova; Kwabena F M Opuni; Bright D Danquah; Hans-Juergen Thiesen; Michael O Glocker
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Mass spectrometric distinction of in-source and in-solution pyroglutamate and succinimide in proteins: a case study on rhG-CSF.

Authors:  Mukesh Kumar; Amarnath Chatterjee; Anand P Khedkar; Mutyalasetty Kusumanchi; Laxmi Adhikary
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Disfavoring macrocycle b fragments by constraining torsional freedom: the "twisted" case of QWFGLM b6.

Authors:  Marcus Tirado; Jochem Rutters; Xian Chen; Alfred Yeung; Jan van Maarseveen; John R Eyler; Giel Berden; Jos Oomens; Nick C Polfer
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  IR action spectroscopy shows competitive oxazolone and diketopiperazine formation in peptides depends on peptide length and identity of terminal residue in the departing fragment.

Authors:  L J Morrison; J Chamot-Rooke; V H Wysocki
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.616

10.  Integrated mass spectrometry-based analysis of plasma glycoproteins and their glycan modifications.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Chee-Hong Wong; Alice Chin; Ayumu Taguchi; Allen Taylor; Samir Hanash; Sadanori Sekiya; Hidenori Takahashi; Masaki Murase; Shigeki Kajihara; Shinichi Iwamoto; Koichi Tanaka
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 13.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.