Kris Vanhaecht1, Karel De Witte, Roeland Depreitere, Walter Sermeus. 1. Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. kris.vanhaecht@med.kuleuven.be
Abstract
AIM: To determine whether clinical/care pathway audit tools can identify the characteristics of well-organized care processes. BACKGROUND: Although pathways are used worldwide, confusion exists about the concept and impact. Evaluation Search of OVID-Medline, Cinahl, British Nursing Index; manual search of the Journal of Integrated Care Pathways; contact with Smartgroup on Clinical Pathways and board members of the European Pathway Association and Google search. KEY ISSUES: We selected seven of 15 clinical pathway audit tools for this review. Through content analysis, we identified 17 characteristics and grouped them using the realistic evaluation paradigm. The Integrated Care Pathway Appraisal Tool is the most appropriate audit tool to assess clinical pathway documents. CONCLUSIONS: It is astonishing that so little research on clinical pathway audit tools has been underwent, given the prevalent use of clinical pathways. Because the concept of clinical pathways remains unclear, a variety of audit tools are needed to help clarify the concept. Further research on the construct and criterion validity of pathway audit tools is necessary to fully understand why and under which circumstances pathways lead to improved care.
AIM: To determine whether clinical/care pathway audit tools can identify the characteristics of well-organized care processes. BACKGROUND: Although pathways are used worldwide, confusion exists about the concept and impact. Evaluation Search of OVID-Medline, Cinahl, British Nursing Index; manual search of the Journal of Integrated Care Pathways; contact with Smartgroup on Clinical Pathways and board members of the European Pathway Association and Google search. KEY ISSUES: We selected seven of 15 clinical pathway audit tools for this review. Through content analysis, we identified 17 characteristics and grouped them using the realistic evaluation paradigm. The Integrated Care Pathway Appraisal Tool is the most appropriate audit tool to assess clinical pathway documents. CONCLUSIONS: It is astonishing that so little research on clinical pathway audit tools has been underwent, given the prevalent use of clinical pathways. Because the concept of clinical pathways remains unclear, a variety of audit tools are needed to help clarify the concept. Further research on the construct and criterion validity of pathway audit tools is necessary to fully understand why and under which circumstances pathways lead to improved care.
Authors: D M Ten Berge; M J Braem; A Altenburg; M Dieltjens; P H Van de Heyning; K Vanhaecht; O M Vanderveken Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Anne M Wilkinson; Claire E Johnson; Helen Walker; Valerie Colgan; Hayley Arnet; Tapan Rai Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kris Vanhaecht; Walter Sermeus; Jan Peers; Cathy Lodewijckx; Svin Deneckere; Fabrizio Leigheb; Steven Boonen; An Sermon; Paulo Boto; Rita Veloso Mendes; Massimiliano Panella Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Fidelia Cascini; Federico Santaroni; Riccardo Lanzetti; Giovanna Failla; Andrea Gentili; Walter Ricciardi Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-05-21