Literature DB >> 17002854

Re-admission rates within 28 days of total hip replacement.

C Cullen1, D S Johnson, G Cook.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to identify the reasons for the higher than expected emergency re-admission to hospital within 28 days of total hip replacement (THR) for Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 42-month period, 65 (8.5%) of 769 patients were re-admitted within 28 days of discharge following primary THR. Case notes for 61 patients were available for retrospective review to assess premorbidity, initial postoperative complications and reason for re-admission.
RESULTS: The main reasons for re-admission were complications related to the procedure. These included thrombo-embolic disease 2.5%, atraumatic dislocation 1.4%, wound complications 1.2% and swollen limb 1.8%. Other causes such as admission to another department for problems not related to THR accounted for 0.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are comparable with the published literature for early complications following THR. The three main reasons for re-admission were atraumatic dislocation, thrombo-embolic and wound complications such as superficial infection and haematoma are the commonest world-wide. The re-admission rate to hospital within the first 28 days following THR was a clinical indicator suggested by the UK Department of Health. It has subsequently been incorporated in a group of indicators used by the CASPE Healthcare Knowledge Systems (CHKS), a private healthcare consultancy and analysis company, for peer benchmarking. Our re-admission rates are inflated by admissions for non-THR-related reasons. The level of post-THR complications leading to re-admission were acceptable compared with the available published literature regarding 28-day re-admission. We anticipate that this study may act as a benchmark for other trusts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17002854      PMCID: PMC1964664          DOI: 10.1308/003588406X116909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  5 in total

1.  Cost effective strategy for a safe diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis at a district general hospital.

Authors:  R Sinharay; G Strang; A D Bird; D Bird
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  The rationale for long-term prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  G Agnelli; G B Mancini; D Biagini
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  Population requirement for primary hip-replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S Frankel; J Eachus; N Pearson; R Greenwood; P Chan; T J Peters; J Donovan; G D Smith; P Dieppe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Projecting the need for hip replacement over the next three decades: influence of changing demography and threshold for surgery.

Authors:  F Birrell; O Johnell; A Silman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population.

Authors:  Nizar N Mahomed; Jane A Barrett; Jeffrey N Katz; Charlotte B Phillips; Elena Losina; Robert A Lew; Edward Guadagnoli; William H Harris; Robert Poss; John A Baron
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.284

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  Impact of a blood management protocol on transfusion rates and outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N Frew; D Alexander; J Hood; A Acornley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Readmission rates in the state of Florida: a reflection of quality?

Authors:  Carlos J Lavernia; Jesus M Villa; David A Iacobelli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Venous thromboembolism knowledge among older post-hip fracture patients and their caregivers.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Lee; Jill Donaldson; Diane Drake; Linda Johnson; Gwen van Servellen; Preston L Reed; Ruth A Mulnard
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.361

4.  Selecting the best prediction model for readmission.

Authors:  Eun Whan Lee
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-07-31

5.  The effect of hospital volume on length of stay, re-admissions, and complications of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keijo T Mäkelä; Unto Häkkinen; Mikko Peltola; Miika Linna; Heikki Kröger; Ville Remes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  Thirty-day readmission rates in orthopedics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James T Bernatz; Jonathan L Tueting; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A case management report: a collaborative perioperative surgical home paradigm and the reduction of total joint arthroplasty readmissions.

Authors:  Navid Alem; Joseph Rinehart; Brian Lee; Doug Merrill; Safa Sobhanie; Kyle Ahn; Ran Schwarzkopf; Maxime Cannesson; Zeev Kain
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-10-18

8.  TWO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR SURGICAL WOUND HEMATOMA AFTER TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT.

Authors:  Lorenzo Fagotti; Leandro Ejnisman; Henrique DE Melo Campos Gurgel; Helder DE Souza Miyahara; Alberto Tesconi Croci; Jose Ricardo Negreiros Vicente
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

9.  Reduced length of hospital stay after the introduction of a rapid recovery protocol for primary THA procedures.

Authors:  Yvon M den Hartog; Nina M C Mathijssen; Stephan B W Vehmeijer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Total Elbow Arthroplasty in the United States: Evaluation of Cost, Patient Demographics, and Complication Rates.

Authors:  Hanbing Zhou; Nathan D Orvets; Gabriel Merlin; Joshua Shaw; Joshua S Dines; Mark D Price; Josef K Eichinger; Xinning Li
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2016-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.