BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease mortality remains high in Europe and many patients have elevated risk factors, despite evidence-based targets and treatment guidelines. This survey examined barriers to implementing cardiovascular risk reduction guidelines. DESIGN: We conducted a semi-structured market research survey of physicians. METHODS: The survey was conducted in six European countries among cardiologists and primary care physicians. In total, 67 questions were used: 35 had multiple choice answers (prompted) and 32 allowed any answer (unprompted). Respondents were working full-time in patient care (>or=3 years experience) and were in a position to initiate cardiovascular drug treatment. RESULTS: Of the 220 respondents (155 primary care physicians, 65 cardiologists), most (85%) based assessment of cardiovascular risk on all risk factors, reflecting a global approach to risk, rather than considering risk factors individually. A majority (62%) used subjective assessments for establishing global risk rather than guidelines or risk calculators. The most common unprompted barrier to guideline implementation was patient compliance (36%) and a lack of time (23%), and when prompted, the most important was government health policy (40%). The most common unprompted suggestion for improving implementation were financial opportunities (24%) and clear and easy to use guidelines (23%), while when prompted the most important change required was the development of simpler guidelines (46%). CONCLUSIONS: Although a majority of physicians are aware of the need to look at a combination of cardiovascular disease risk factors, less than half use guidelines or risk calculators to determine total risk. It is recommended that guidelines need to be simpler and easier to use and supplemented with (patient friendly) risk calculators.
BACKGROUND:Cardiovascular disease mortality remains high in Europe and many patients have elevated risk factors, despite evidence-based targets and treatment guidelines. This survey examined barriers to implementing cardiovascular risk reduction guidelines. DESIGN: We conducted a semi-structured market research survey of physicians. METHODS: The survey was conducted in six European countries among cardiologists and primary care physicians. In total, 67 questions were used: 35 had multiple choice answers (prompted) and 32 allowed any answer (unprompted). Respondents were working full-time in patient care (>or=3 years experience) and were in a position to initiate cardiovascular drug treatment. RESULTS: Of the 220 respondents (155 primary care physicians, 65 cardiologists), most (85%) based assessment of cardiovascular risk on all risk factors, reflecting a global approach to risk, rather than considering risk factors individually. A majority (62%) used subjective assessments for establishing global risk rather than guidelines or risk calculators. The most common unprompted barrier to guideline implementation was patient compliance (36%) and a lack of time (23%), and when prompted, the most important was government health policy (40%). The most common unprompted suggestion for improving implementation were financial opportunities (24%) and clear and easy to use guidelines (23%), while when prompted the most important change required was the development of simpler guidelines (46%). CONCLUSIONS: Although a majority of physicians are aware of the need to look at a combination of cardiovascular disease risk factors, less than half use guidelines or risk calculators to determine total risk. It is recommended that guidelines need to be simpler and easier to use and supplemented with (patient friendly) risk calculators.
Authors: Shin-Ping Tu; Vicki M Young; Letoynia J Coombs; Rebecca S Williams; Michelle C Kegler; Amanda T Kimura; Betsy C Risendal; Daniela B Friedman; Beth A Glenn; Debbie J Pfeiffer; Maria E Fernandez Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Shin-Ping Tu; Sherry Feng; Richard Storch; Mei-Po Yip; HeeYon Sohng; Mingang Fu; Alan Chun Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2012-11
Authors: Maria B Ospina; Paul Taenzer; Saifee Rashiq; Joy C MacDermid; Eloise Carr; Dagmara Chojecki; Christa Harstall; James L Henry Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.037
Authors: Joep Perk; Guy De Backer; Helmut Gohlke; Ian Graham; Zeljko Reiner; W M Monique Verschuren; Christian Albus; Pascale Benlian; Gudrun Boysen; Renata Cifkova; Christi Deaton; Shah Ebrahim; Miles Fisher; Giuseppe Germano; Richard Hobbs; Arno Hoes; Sehnaz Karadeniz; Alessandro Mezzani; Eva Prescott; Lars Ryden; Martin Scherer; Mikko Syvänne; Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer; Christiaan Vrints; David Wood; Jose Luis Zamorano; Faiez Zannad Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2012-12