Literature DB >> 17001122

The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis.

Nicole N Woods1, Alan J Neville, Anthony J Levinson, Elizabeth H A Howey, Wieslaw J Oczkowski, Geoffrey R Norman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of basic science knowledge in clinical diagnosis is unclear. There has been no experimental demonstration of its value in helping students recall and organize clinical information. This study examines how causal knowledge may lead to better recall and diagnostic skill over time.
METHOD: Undergraduate medical students learned either four neurological or rheumatic disorders. One group learned a basic science explanation for the symptoms. The other learned epidemiological information. Both were then tested with the same set of clinical cases immediately after learning and one week later.
RESULTS: On immediate test, there was no difference in accuracy (70% for both groups). However, one week later, performance in the epidemiology group dropped to 51%; the basic science group only dropped to 62%.
CONCLUSIONS: Basic science knowledge relating causal knowledge to disease symptoms can improve diagnostic accuracy after a delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17001122     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200610001-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  26 in total

1.  Why Content and Cognition Matter: Integrating Conceptual Knowledge to Support Simulation-Based Procedural Skills Transfer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J H Cheung; Kulamakan M Kulasegaram; Nicole N Woods; Ryan Brydges
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Performance in the Duke-Elder ophthalmology undergraduate prize examination and future careers in ophthalmology.

Authors:  L Joshi; V A Shanmuganathan; R L Kneebone; W Amoaku
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The importance of basic science and research training for the next generation of physicians and physician scientists.

Authors:  Donald B DeFranco; Gwendolyn Sowa
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Integration of Basic and Clinical Science Courses in US PharmD Programs.

Authors:  Mohammed A Islam; Rahmat M Talukder; Reza Taheri; Nicholas Blanchard
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Faculty reflections on the process of building an integrated preclerkship curriculum: a new school perspective.

Authors:  Mohammed K Khalil; Jonathan D Kibble
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  A Mind of Their Own: Using Inquiry-based Teaching to Build Critical Thinking Skills and Intellectual Engagement in an Undergraduate Neuroanatomy Course.

Authors:  Ralf R Greenwald; Ian J Quitadamo
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2014-03-15

Review 7.  Integrating Concept Maps into a Medical Student Oncology Curriculum.

Authors:  Sam Brondfield; Allen Seol; Katherine Hyland; Arianne Teherani; Gerald Hsu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Basic biomedical sciences and the future of medical education: implications for internal medicine.

Authors:  Eric P Brass
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Integrating Foundational Sciences in a Clinical Context in the Post-Clerkship Curriculum.

Authors:  Kimberly Brown Dahlman; Matthew B Weinger; Kimberly D Lomis; Lillian Nanney; Neil Osheroff; Donald E Moore; Lourdes Estrada; William B Cutrer
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2018-01-02

10.  Generalists as Clinical Physiologists: Bringing Science Back to the Bedside.

Authors:  Daniel N Ricotta; Andrew J Hale; Jason A Freed; Tara E Scribner; Mark L Zeidel; Shoshana J Herzig
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.