PURPOSE: One of the most significant limitations of at-home autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the necessity for hospital readmission. We developed an at-home ASCT program in which prophylactic ceftriaxone and treatment of febrile neutropenia with piperacillin and tazobactam was introduced to minimize the readmission rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2000 and February 2005, 178 consecutive patients underwent ASCT for a hematologic malignancy. Of these, 50 patients fulfilled the requirements for at-home ASCT. Results were compared with those observed in a control group of 50 patients individually matched to the group of patients treated at home for age, sex, diagnosis, stage of disease, conditioning, and source of stem cells. RESULTS: Febrile neutropenia occurred in fewer patients in the at-home group as compared with the hospitalized group (76% v 96%: P = .008), and duration of fever was also shorter in the at-home group (median, 2 and 6 days, respectively; range, 1 to 11 and 1 to 20 days, respectively; P = .00003). Hospital readmission in the at-home group was required in only four cases (8%). This resulted in a reduction of 18.6 days of hospitalization per patient. Likewise, total median charges were approximately half in the at-home group as compared with the in-hospital group (3,345 euro v 6,250 euro, respectively; P < .00001). CONCLUSION: Results of at-home ASCT with prophylactic administration of ceftriaxone and domiciliary treatment of febrile neutropenia with piperacillin and tazobactam are highly satisfactory and significantly cheaper compared with those obtained with conventional in-hospital ASCT.
PURPOSE: One of the most significant limitations of at-home autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the necessity for hospital readmission. We developed an at-home ASCT program in which prophylactic ceftriaxone and treatment of febrile neutropenia with piperacillin and tazobactam was introduced to minimize the readmission rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2000 and February 2005, 178 consecutive patients underwent ASCT for a hematologic malignancy. Of these, 50 patients fulfilled the requirements for at-home ASCT. Results were compared with those observed in a control group of 50 patients individually matched to the group of patients treated at home for age, sex, diagnosis, stage of disease, conditioning, and source of stem cells. RESULTS:Febrile neutropenia occurred in fewer patients in the at-home group as compared with the hospitalized group (76% v 96%: P = .008), and duration of fever was also shorter in the at-home group (median, 2 and 6 days, respectively; range, 1 to 11 and 1 to 20 days, respectively; P = .00003). Hospital readmission in the at-home group was required in only four cases (8%). This resulted in a reduction of 18.6 days of hospitalization per patient. Likewise, total median charges were approximately half in the at-home group as compared with the in-hospital group (3,345 euro v 6,250 euro, respectively; P < .00001). CONCLUSION: Results of at-home ASCT with prophylactic administration of ceftriaxone and domiciliary treatment of febrile neutropenia with piperacillin and tazobactam are highly satisfactory and significantly cheaper compared with those obtained with conventional in-hospital ASCT.
Authors: N Martínez-Cibrian; L Magnano; G Gutiérrez-García; X Andrade; J G Correa; M Suárez-Lledó; C Martínez; M Rovira; E Carreras; L Rosiñol; C F de Larrea; M T Cibeira; A Gaya; C Gallego; A Hernando; N Creus; J Bladé; Á Urbano-Ispizua; F Fernández-Avilés Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: B Freeman; D Brauneis; D C Seldin; K Quillen; J M Sloan; A S Renteria; A C Shelton; T Teschner; K T Finn; V Sanchorawala Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Gonzalo Gutiérrez-García; Montserrat Rovira; Nacira Arab; Cristina Gallego; Joan Sánchez; María Ángeles Álvarez; Pilar Ayora; Ariadna Domenech; Nuria Borràs; Luis Gerardo Rodríguez-Lobato; Laura Rosiñol; Pedro Marín; Alexandra Pedraza; Alexandra Martínez-Roca; Esther Carcelero; María Dolores Herrera; María Teresa Solano; Carla Ramos; Noemí de Llobet; Anna Serrahima; Miquel Lozano; Joan Cid; Carmen Martínez; María Suárez-Lledó; Álvaro Urbano-Ispizua; Francesc Fernández-Avilés Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: B S Sohn; D H Yoon; S Kim; K Lee; E H Kang; J S Park; D H Lee; S H Kim; J Huh; C Suh Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2011-12-04 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: M Martino; R M Lemoli; C Girmenia; L Castagna; B Bruno; F Cavallo; M Offidani; I Scortechini; M Montanari; G Milone; L Postacchini; A Olivieri Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: C Font; F Fernández-Avilés; C Calderon; T García-Fernández; N Arab; E Pineda; E Buxó; P Ayora; M Carreño; V Pereira; M Viladot; C Moreno; C Gallego; A Hernando; N Creus; C Barrera; R Alcaraz; J Sanchez; A Prat; A Tuca Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 3.359