Literature DB >> 17000805

Task analysis of the preincision surgical period: an independent observer-based study of 1558 cases.

Alejandro Escobar1, Elizabeth A Davis, Jan Ehrenwerth, Gail A Watrous, Gene S Fisch, Zeev N Kain, Paul G Barash.   

Abstract

Intense production pressure has focused on the preincision period (from patient-on-table to incision) as an important component of overall operating room efficiency. We conducted a prospective study in which trained independent observers measured the performance of anesthesiologists, surgeons, and nursing staff to determine anesthesia release time (ART, patient-on-table until release for surgical preparation) and surgical preparation time (SPT, start surgical preparation to incision) and the factors, including delays, that affect their duration. We enrolled 1558 patients undergoing elective surgery in a tertiary medical center. The mean ART was 21 +/- 16 min. Mean SPT was 22 +/- 13 min, and mean case length was 207 +/- 123 min. Significant variation was seen in both ART (range, 1-115 min) and SPT (range, 1-130 min). Multivariate regression analysis revealed ASA physical status, age, level of resident training, invasive monitoring, case length, and case number in the room were all positive predictors of ART duration (P < 0.05). In contrast, gender, body mass index, number of anesthesia personnel concurrently in the room, and number of rooms covered per anesthesia attending were not predictors for ART (P > 0.05). Delays affected both ART and SPT and were encountered in 24.5% of all procedures (surgery 66.8%, anesthesiology 21.7%, and logistical 11.5%). For operating room scheduling purposes, we conclude that assigning a constant fixed duration for anesthetic induction is inappropriate and will result in creating erroneous administrative expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17000805     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000232443.24914.8d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  [Utilization rates and turnover times as indicators of OR workflow efficiency].

Authors:  M Schuster; L L Wicha; M Fiege; A E Goetz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Delays in starting morning operating lists: an analysis of more than 20,000 cases in 22 German hospitals.

Authors:  Martin Schuster; Marco Pezzella; Christian Taube; Enno Bialas; Matthias Diemer; Martin Bauer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Evaluation of Variability in Operative Efficiency in Plastic Surgery Procedures.

Authors:  Alexis L Boson; Evan Ross; Daniel Popp; Christian Tapking; Arianna Ramirez; Ludwik Branski; Linda G Phillips; Steven E Wolf
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  Sample times for surveillance of S. aureus transmission to monitor effectiveness and provide feedback on intraoperative infection control.

Authors:  Subhradeep Datta; Franklin Dexter; Johannes Ledolter; Russell T Wall; Randy W Loftus
Journal:  Perioper Care Oper Room Manag       Date:  2020-10-10

5.  They did what ... ?

Authors:  Robert B Schonberger; Paul G Barash
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Mapping registered nurse anaesthetists' intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Karolina Olin; Camilla Göras; Ulrica Nilsson; Maria Unbeck; Anna Ehrenberg; Karin Pukk-Härenstam; Mirjam Ekstedt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.