Literature DB >> 17000683

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for neutropenia with patient subgroup identification: comparison across anticancer drugs.

Charlotte Kloft1, Johan Wallin, Anja Henningsson, Etienne Chatelut, Mats O Karlsson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer chemotherapy, although based on body surface area, often causes unpredictable myelosuppression, especially severe neutropenia. The aim of this study was to evaluate qualitatively and quantitatively the influence of patient-specific characteristics on the neutrophil concentration-time course, to identify patient subgroups, and to compare covariates on system-related pharmacodynamic variable between drugs. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Drug and neutrophil concentration, demographic, and clinical chemistry data of several trials with docetaxel (637 patients), paclitaxel (45 patients), etoposide (71 patients), or topotecan (191 patients) were included in the covariate analysis of a physiology-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic neutropenia model. Comparisons of covariate relations across drugs were made.
RESULTS: A population model incorporating four to five relevant patient factors for each drug to explain variability in the degree and duration of neutropenia has been developed. Sex, previous anticancer therapy, performance status, height, binding partners, or liver enzymes influenced system-related variables and alpha1-acid glycoprotein, albumin, bilirubin, concomitant cytotoxic agents, or administration route changed drug-specific variables. Overall, female and pretreated patients had a lower baseline neutrophil concentration. Across-drug comparison revealed that several covariates (e.g., age) had minor (clinically irrelevant) influences but consistently shifted the pharmacodynamic variable in the same direction.
CONCLUSIONS: These mechanistic models, including patient characteristics that influence drug-specific parameters, form the rationale basis for more tailored dosing of individual patients or subgroups to minimize the risk of infection and thus might contribute to a more successful therapy. In addition, nonsignificant or clinically irrelevant relations on system-related parameters suggest that these covariates could be negligible in clinical trails and daily use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17000683     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  29 in total

1.  Controlling the Evolution of Resistance.

Authors:  Rutao Luo; Lamont Cannon; Jason Hernandez; Michael J Piovoso; Ryan Zurakowski
Journal:  J Process Control       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.666

2.  A simultaneous analysis of the time-course of leukocytes and neutrophils following docetaxel administration using a semi-mechanistic myelosuppression model.

Authors:  Angelica Linnea Quartino; Lena E Friberg; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Semi-mechanistic model for neutropenia after high dose of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Amelia Ramon-Lopez; Ricardo Nalda-Molina; Belen Valenzuela; Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Refinement of the population pharmacokinetic model for the monoclonal antibody matuzumab: external model evaluation and simulations.

Authors:  Katharina Kuester; Andreas Kovar; Christian Lüpfert; Brigitte Brockhaus; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  A fast method for testing covariates in population PK/PD Models.

Authors:  Akash Khandelwal; Kajsa Harling; E Niclas Jonsson; Andrew C Hooker; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Concordance between criteria for covariate model building.

Authors:  Stefanie Hennig; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of neutropenia in cancer patients receiving PM00104 (Zalypsis(®)).

Authors:  Mario González-Sales; Belén Valenzuela; Carlos Pérez-Ruixo; Carlos Fernández Teruel; Bernardo Miguel-Lillo; Arturo Soto-Matos; Juan Jose Pérez-Ruixo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Risk analysis of severe myelotoxicity with temozolomide: the effects of clinical and genetic factors.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong; Yumei Cao; Michael E Scheurer; Elizabeth Vera-Bolaños; Rochelle Manning; Mehmet F Okcu; Melissa Bondy; Renke Zhou; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Using machine learning to optimize antibiotic combinations: dosing strategies for meropenem and polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  N M Smith; J R Lenhard; K R Boissonneault; C B Landersdorfer; J B Bulitta; P N Holden; A Forrest; R L Nation; J Li; B T Tsuji
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 8.067

10.  Scaling the time-course of myelosuppression from rats to patients with a semi-physiological model.

Authors:  Lena E Friberg; Marie Sandström; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.