Literature DB >> 17000492

Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence: what are the experiences of women with endometriosis?

E Denny1, K S Khan.   

Abstract

Just as systematic reviews of quantitative research have developed over the last two decades, the use of a systematic review is also superseding narrative non-systematic reviews in qualitative research in an attempt to bring rigour to reviewing research evidence. Qualitative research is concerned with the subjective world and the way in which people interpret and make sense of the reality of their lives. This paper describes procedures for conducting a systematic review on qualitative research, and the methods for assessing the quality of qualitative research papers, using published qualitative research on endometriosis as an example to demonstrate these. The conclusion from the systematic review carried out is that the values and methods utilised for a systematic review can usefully be applied to qualitative research. The review of endometriosis research revealed that despite the impact of endometriosis on the lives of women sufferers, little qualitative research has been conducted, and much of that which exists lacks rigour in a number of key areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17000492     DOI: 10.1080/01443610600797301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  7 in total

1.  Patients' report on how endometriosis affects health, work, and daily life.

Authors:  Jessica Fourquet; Xin Gao; Diego Zavala; Juan C Orengo; Sonia Abac; Abigail Ruiz; Joaquín Laboy; Idhaliz Flores
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Body image concerns in individuals diagnosed with benign gynaecological conditions: scoping review and meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Katherine Sayer-Jones; Kerry A Sherman
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2021-05-15

Review 3.  The Subjective Experience of Dyspareunia in Women with Endometriosis: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis of Qualitative Research.

Authors:  Federica Facchin; Laura Buggio; Dhouha Dridi; Giussy Barbara; Paolo Vercellini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence'.

Authors:  Tracy Merlin; Adele Weston; Rebecca Tooher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Impact of endometriosis on women's lives: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Maryam Moradi; Melissa Parker; Anne Sneddon; Violeta Lopez; David Ellwood
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Patients' and physicians' descriptions of occurrence and diagnosis of endometriosis: a qualitative study from Iran.

Authors:  Hedyeh Riazi; Najmeh Tehranian; Saeideh Ziaei; Easa Mohammadi; Ebrahim Hajizadeh; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Living with endometriosis: a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Teresa Rea; Pierluigi Giampaolino; Silvio Simeone; Gianluca Pucciarelli; Rosaria Alvaro; Assunta Guillari
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2020-09-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.