OBJECTIVE: Inattention is undoubtedly one of the main characteristics of Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Nevertheless, a growing corpus of evidence shows that not all attentional processes are affected in this condition. This study aimed to explore the distribution of attentional resources in children with ADHD via a spatially shifted double-oddball visual task. METHODS: We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) for all visual stimuli. Subjects were instructed to allocate attention in a specific area of visual space while ignoring all stimuli presented outside. Ten male children (age: 9-14; mean = 11.6 +/- 2.1) who met DSM-IV criteria for the ADHD combined subtype participated in the study, along with ten age- and sex-matched healthy controls (9-14; mean = 11.2 +/- 2.3). RESULTS: ADHD subjects showed late differential cortical responses to initially suppressed irrelevant stimuli. The amplitude of early N1-P1 components were mainly modulated by stimulus location and showed no significant differences between groups, but a late P300-like positivity was clearly evoked in the ADHD group by peripheral stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ADHD may not compromise the early attentional spatial filter but rather entails a different distribution of attentional resources at later stages of cortical processing. Perhaps these differences may be attributable to individual differences in attentional mechanisms. SIGNIFICANCE: ADHD may not affect initial focusing of visual attention but rather the allocation of processing resources in later stages.
OBJECTIVE: Inattention is undoubtedly one of the main characteristics of Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Nevertheless, a growing corpus of evidence shows that not all attentional processes are affected in this condition. This study aimed to explore the distribution of attentional resources in children with ADHD via a spatially shifted double-oddball visual task. METHODS: We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) for all visual stimuli. Subjects were instructed to allocate attention in a specific area of visual space while ignoring all stimuli presented outside. Ten male children (age: 9-14; mean = 11.6 +/- 2.1) who met DSM-IV criteria for the ADHD combined subtype participated in the study, along with ten age- and sex-matched healthy controls (9-14; mean = 11.2 +/- 2.3). RESULTS:ADHD subjects showed late differential cortical responses to initially suppressed irrelevant stimuli. The amplitude of early N1-P1 components were mainly modulated by stimulus location and showed no significant differences between groups, but a late P300-like positivity was clearly evoked in the ADHD group by peripheral stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ADHD may not compromise the early attentional spatial filter but rather entails a different distribution of attentional resources at later stages of cortical processing. Perhaps these differences may be attributable to individual differences in attentional mechanisms. SIGNIFICANCE: ADHD may not affect initial focusing of visual attention but rather the allocation of processing resources in later stages.
Authors: A C Janes; J M Gilman; B B Frederick; M Radoman; G Pachas; M Fava; A E Evins Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Johanna Kreither; Javier Lopez-Calderon; Carly J Leonard; Benjamin M Robinson; Abigail Ruffle; Britta Hahn; James M Gold; Steven J Luck Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Daniel C Javitt; Kevin M Spencer; Gunvant K Thaker; Georg Winterer; Mihály Hajós Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Francisco Zamorano; Pablo Billeke; Leonie Kausel; Josefina Larrain; Ximena Stecher; Jose M Hurtado; Vladimir López; Ximena Carrasco; Francisco Aboitiz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 4.379