Literature DB >> 16999654

Incidence and economic implications of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in medical patients receiving prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism.

Freddy M Creekmore1, Gary M Oderda, Robert C Pendleton, Diana I Brixner.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients admitted to a medical service who were given unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to prevent venous thromboembolism, the incremental cost of developing HIT, and the cost consequences of using LMWH to prevent venous thromboembolism in medical patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis with a nested case-control.
SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 10,121 adult medical patients admitted between August 1, 2000, and November 2, 2004, received UFH or LMWH to prevent venous thromboembolism during their admission. From these, patients with immune-mediated HIT were identified and served as case patients, and 3-5 matched control patients were identified for each case patient.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The development of HIT was determined for patients who received LMWH and for patients who received UFH. Costs were compared between the patients with HIT and the matched control patients. The cost of using LMWH to prevent venous thromboembolism was compared with the cost of using UFH. In patients receiving UFH and those receiving LMWH, the incidence of HIT was 0.51% (43/8420) and 0.084% (1/1189), respectively (p=0.037), with an overall incidence of 0.43% (44/10,121). Admissions that included development of HIT incurred an average cost of 56,364 dollars compared with 15,231 dollars (p<0.001) for admissions without HIT. Using LMWH to prevent venous thromboembolism in medical patients cost 13.88 dollars less per patient than using UFH.
CONCLUSIONS: For the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, LMWH was associated with a lower incidence of HIT than UFH in medical patients. An admission during which the patient develops HIT costs significantly more than an admission during which the patient does not develop HIT. Low-molecular-weight heparin is cost-effective for prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16999654     DOI: 10.1592/phco.26.10.1438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  15 in total

1.  [Thromboprophylaxis in the critically ill : Low molecular weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin].

Authors:  S Petros
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 2.  The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Richard E Nelson; Kwame A Nyarko; Lisa C Richardson; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  A 1-year drug utilization evaluation of protamine in hospitalized patients to identify possible future roles of heparin and low molecular weight heparin reversal agents.

Authors:  Charles E Mahan
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  [Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) : A medical-economic view].

Authors:  R Riedel; A Schmieder; A Koster; S Kim; G Baumgarten; J C Schewe
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  The impact of the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) computerized alert on provider behaviors and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan S Austrian; Jason S Adelman; Stan H Reissman; Hillel W Cohen; Henny H Billett
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Drug-induced thrombocytopenia for the hospitalist physician with a focus on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Matthew T Rondina; Amanda Walker; Robert C Pendleton
Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)       Date:  2010-04

7.  The direct medical costs associated with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Natasha Nanwa; Nicole Mittmann; Sandra Knowles; Claudia Bucci; Rita Selby; Neil Shear; Scott E Walker; William Geerts
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Cost and occurrence of thrombocytopenia in patients receiving venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following major orthopaedic surgeries.

Authors:  Laura Elizabeth Happe; Eileen Marie Farrelly; Richard H Stanford; Matt William Sarnes
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Is thromboprophylaxis cost effective in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A systematic review and cost analysis.

Authors:  Kelly Comerford Wormer; Ayesha A Jangda; Farah A El Sayed; Katherine I Stewart; Sunni L Mumford; James H Segars
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  The Pharmacotherapy of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) : A Review of Contemporary Therapeutic Challenges in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Yahaya Hassan; Ahmed Awaisu; Ahmad Abdulrahman Al-Meman; Noorizan Abd Aziz
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.