Literature DB >> 1699915

A numerical procedure for choosing effective, low toxicity plasticizers for glycol methacrylate embedding.

P O Gerrits1, R W Horobin, M J Hardonk.   

Abstract

A numerical method for selecting low toxicity plasticizers for glycol methacrylate (GMA) embedding mixtures is described. It involves use of various numerical parameters, namely; molecular weight, melting point, solubility parameter, and toxicity data. On the basis of these parameters, nine plasticizers were selected. Their effects on microtomy and tissue processing, and also their influence on tissue morphology and staining, were investigated. For tissue processed at low temperatures into GMA, using ethanol dehydration, the following compounds were as satisfactory as 2-butoxyethanol whilst being less toxic: 2-isopropoxyethanol, 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol, 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethanol, 2-(n-butoxyethoxy)ethanol. However for tissues processed using the plasticizer as dehydrating agent, the optimum plasticizers were 2-isopropoxyethanol, 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol and 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethanol. It is possible to give a numerical specification of the preferred plasticizers, and for the first procedure this is: a solubility parameter in the range 21-26 J0.5 cm-1.5 or higher, a melting point well below 0 degree C, and a rat oral LD50 greater than 12.52 mmol kg-1. It was also possible to analyse the differential effects of the dehydrating agents on histochemical and enzyme histochemical staining on a numerical basis, using a structure-activity relations approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1699915     DOI: 10.1007/bf01003464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochem J        ISSN: 0018-2214


  13 in total

1.  Histochemical demonstration of enzyme activities in plastic and paraffin embedded tissue sections.

Authors:  S Higuchi; M Suga; A M Dannenberg; B H Schofield
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1979-01

2.  [The effect of fixation, dehydration and polymethacrylate imbedding on the results of immuno- and enzymehistochemical studies on lymphatic tissue and bone marrow].

Authors:  M Hantschick; E Wolf; G Dominok
Journal:  Acta Histochem Suppl       Date:  1988

3.  A simple method of preparing 1-2 microm sections of large tissue blocks using glycol methacrylate.

Authors:  B Sims
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Neutralization of acid in glycol methacrylate and the use of cyclohexanol as a plasticizer.

Authors:  R Frater
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1981-03

5.  Staining plastic sections: a review of problems, explanations and possible solutions.

Authors:  R W Horobin
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  The influence of dehydration media and catalyst systems upon the enzyme activity of tissues embedded in 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate: an evaluation of three dehydration media and two catalyst systems.

Authors:  P O Gerrits; R Zuideveld
Journal:  Mikroskopie       Date:  1983-12

7.  Bone embedding in pure methyl methacrylate at low temperature preserves enzyme activities.

Authors:  D Chappard; S Palle; C Alexandre; L Vico; G Riffat
Journal:  Acta Histochem       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.479

8.  Embedding media for 1-2 micron sectioning. 2. Hydroxyethyl methacrylate combined with 2-butoxyethanol.

Authors:  C L Ruddell
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1967-09

9.  Floating on a water bath and mounting glycol methacrylate and hydroxypropyl methacrylate sections influence final dimensions.

Authors:  P O Gerrits; M B van Leeuwen; M E Boon; L P Kok
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  A new, less toxic polymerization system for the embedding of soft tissues in glycol methacrylate and subsequent preparing of serial sections.

Authors:  P O Gerrits; L Smid
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 1.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.