Literature DB >> 16999141

Arsenic removal from groundwater by household sand filters: comparative field study, model calculations, and health benefits.

Michael Berg1, Samuel Luzi, Pham Thi Kim Trang, Pham Hung Viet, Walter Giger, Doris Stüben.   

Abstract

Arsenic removal efficiencies of 43 household sand filters were studied in rural areas of the Red River Delta in Vietnam. Simultaneously, raw groundwater from the same households and additional 31 tubewells was sampled to investigate arsenic coprecipitation with hydrous ferric iron from solution, i.e., without contact to sand surfaces. From the groundwaters containing 10-382 microg/L As, < 0.1-48 mg/L Fe, < 0.01-3.7 mg/L P, and 0.05-3.3 mg/L Mn, similar average removal rates of 80% and 76% were found for the sand filter and coprecipitation experiments, respectively. The filtering process requires only a few minutes. Removal efficiencies of Fe, phosphate, and Mn were > 99%, 90%, and 71%, respectively. The concentration of dissolved iron in groundwater was the decisive factor for the removal of arsenic. Residual arsenic levels below 50 microg/L were achieved by 90% of the studied sand filters, and 40% were even below 10 microg/L. Fe/As ratios of > or = 50 or > or = 250 were required to ensure arsenic removal to levels below 50 or 10 microg/L, respectively. Phosphate concentrations > 2.5 mg P/L slightly hampered the sand filter and coprecipitation efficiencies. Interestingly, the overall arsenic elimination was higher than predicted from model calculations based on sorption constants determined from coprecipitation experiments with artificial groundwater. This observation is assumed to result from As(lll) oxidation involving Mn, microorganisms, and possibly dissolved organic matter present in the natural groundwaters. Clear evidence of lowered arsenic burden for people consuming sand-filtered water is demonstrated from hair analyses. The investigated sand filters proved to operate fast and robust for a broad range of groundwater composition and are thus also a viable option for mitigation in other arsenic affected regions. An estimation conducted for Bangladesh indicates that a median residual level of 25 microg/L arsenic could be reached in 84% of the polluted groundwater. The easily observable removal of iron from the pumped water makes the effect of a sand filter immediately recognizable even to people who are not aware of the arsenic problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16999141     DOI: 10.1021/es060144z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  10 in total

1.  Arsenic geochemistry and human health in South East Asia.

Authors:  Kathleen M McCarty; Hoang Thi Hanh; Kyoung-Woong Kim
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.458

2.  Field, experimental, and modeling study of arsenic partitioning across a redox transition in a Bangladesh aquifer.

Authors:  Hun Bok Jung; Benjamin C Bostick; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Provision of well-water treatment units to 600 households in Bangladesh: A longitudinal analysis of urinary arsenic indicates fading utility.

Authors:  Tiffany R Sanchez; Diane Levy; Mohammad Hasan Shahriar; Mohammad Nasir Uddin; Abu B Siddique; Joseph H Graziano; Angela Lomax-Luu; Alexander van Geen; Mary V Gamble
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Arsenic and other trace elements in groundwater and human urine in Ha Nam province, the Northern Vietnam: contamination characteristics and risk assessment.

Authors:  Long Hai Pham; Hue Thi Nguyen; Cuong Van Tran; Ha Manh Nguyen; Tung Hoang Nguyen; Minh Binh Tu
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 5.  Individual variations in inorganic arsenic metabolism associated with AS3MT genetic polymorphisms.

Authors:  Tetsuro Agusa; Junko Fujihara; Haruo Takeshita; Hisato Iwata
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Assessing health risk due to exposure to arsenic in drinking water in Hanam Province, Vietnam.

Authors:  Tung Bui Huy; Tran Thi Tuyet-Hanh; Richard Johnston; Hung Nguyen-Viet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Current and future microbiological strategies to remove As and Cd from drinking water.

Authors:  James M Byrne; Andreas Kappler
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.813

Review 8.  Arsenic contaminated groundwater and its treatment options in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Jia-Qian Jiang; S M Ashekuzzaman; Anlun Jiang; S M Sharifuzzaman; Sayedur Rahman Chowdhury
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Reduction in urinary arsenic levels in response to arsenic mitigation efforts in Araihazar, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Alexander van Geen; Joseph H Graziano; Alexander Pfaff; Malgosia Madajewicz; Faruque Parvez; A Z M Iftekhar Hussain; Vesna Slavkovich; Tariqul Islam; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Effect of aeration, iron and arsenic concentrations, and groundwater matrix on arsenic removal using laboratory sand filtration.

Authors:  Cynthia A Coles; Danial Rohail
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.609

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.