Literature DB >> 16998821

Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.

Lawrence C McCandless1, Paul Gustafson, Adrian Levy.   

Abstract

We consider Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies where the association between a binary exposure, binary response, measured confounders and a single binary unmeasured confounder can be formulated using logistic regression models. A model for unmeasured confounding is presented along with a family of prior distributions that model beliefs about a possible unknown unmeasured confounder. Simulation from the posterior distribution is accomplished using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Because the model for unmeasured confounding is not identifiable, standard large-sample theory for Bayesian analysis is not applicable. Consequently, the impact of different choices of prior distributions on the coverage probability of credible intervals is unknown. Using simulations, we investigate the coverage probability when averaged with respect to various distributions over the parameter space. The results indicate that credible intervals will have approximately nominal coverage probability, on average, when the prior distribution used for sensitivity analysis approximates the sampling distribution of model parameters in a hypothetical sequence of observational studies. We motivate the method in a study of the effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for treatment of heart failure. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16998821     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  25 in total

1.  Risk of intracranial hypertension with intrauterine levonorgestrel.

Authors:  Mahyar Etminan; Hao Luo; Paul Gustafson
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2015-06

2.  Nonparametric Bounds and Sensitivity Analysis of Treatment Effects.

Authors:  Amy Richardson; Michael G Hudgens; Peter B Gilbert; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.901

3.  Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele; Onyebuchi A Arah
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Using Sensitivity Analyses for Unobserved Confounding to Address Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.

Authors:  Kara E Rudolph; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING IN COARSE STRUCTURAL NESTED MEAN MODELS.

Authors:  Shu Yang; Judith J Lok
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.261

6.  EVALUATING COSTS WITH UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING: A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT EFFECT.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Handorf; Justin E Bekelman; Daniel F Heitjan; Nandita Mitra
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 7.  Probabilistic approaches to better quantifying the results of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Paul Gustafson; Lawrence C McCandless
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Identifiability, exchangeability and confounding revisited.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2009-09-04

9.  Bayesian bias adjustments of the lung cancer SMR in a cohort of German carbon black production workers.

Authors:  Peter Morfeld; Robert J McCunney
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  Covariate balance in a Bayesian propensity score analysis of beta blocker therapy in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Lawrence C McCandless; Paul Gustafson; Peter C Austin; Adrian R Levy
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2009-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.