BACKGROUND: Association studies have become a common and popular method to identify genetic variants predisposing to complex diseases. Despite considerable efforts and initial promising findings, the field of prostate cancer genetics is characterized by inconclusive reports and no prostate cancer gene has yet been established. METHODS: We performed a literature review and identified 79 different polymorphisms reported to influence prostate cancer risk. Of these, 46 were selected and tested for association in a large Swedish population-based case-control prostate cancer population. RESULTS: We observed significant (P < 0.05) confirmation for six polymorphisms located in five different genes. Three of them coded for key enzymes in the androgen biosynthesis and response pathway; the CAG repeat in the androgen receptor (AR) gene (P = 0.03), one SNP in the CYP17 gene (P = 0.04), two SNPs in the SRD5A2 gene (P = 0.02 and 0.02, respectively), a deletion of the GSTT1 gene (P = 0.006), and one SNP in the MSR1 gene, IVS5-59C > A, (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the difficulties to replicate findings in genetic association studies, our results strongly support the importance of androgen pathway genes in prostate cancer etiology.
BACKGROUND: Association studies have become a common and popular method to identify genetic variants predisposing to complex diseases. Despite considerable efforts and initial promising findings, the field of prostate cancer genetics is characterized by inconclusive reports and no prostate cancer gene has yet been established. METHODS: We performed a literature review and identified 79 different polymorphisms reported to influence prostate cancer risk. Of these, 46 were selected and tested for association in a large Swedish population-based case-control prostate cancer population. RESULTS: We observed significant (P < 0.05) confirmation for six polymorphisms located in five different genes. Three of them coded for key enzymes in the androgen biosynthesis and response pathway; the CAG repeat in the androgen receptor (AR) gene (P = 0.03), one SNP in the CYP17 gene (P = 0.04), two SNPs in the SRD5A2 gene (P = 0.02 and 0.02, respectively), a deletion of the GSTT1 gene (P = 0.006), and one SNP in the MSR1 gene, IVS5-59C > A, (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the difficulties to replicate findings in genetic association studies, our results strongly support the importance of androgen pathway genes in prostate cancer etiology.
Authors: Irina N Bespalova; Martina Durner; Benjamin P Ritter; Gary W Angelo; Enrique Rossy-Fullana; Jose Carrion-Baralt; James Schmeidler; Jeremy M Silverman Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-09-26 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Fang-Chi Hsu; Sara Lindström; Jielin Sun; Fredrik Wiklund; Shyh-Huei Chen; Hans-Olov Adami; Aubrey R Turner; Wennuan Liu; Katarina Bälter; Jin Woo Kim; Pär Stattin; Bao-Li Chang; William B Isaacs; Jianfeng Xu; Henrik Grönberg; S Lilly Zheng Journal: Cancer Genet Cytogenet Date: 2008-06
Authors: C Leigh Pearce; David J Van Den Berg; Nick Makridakis; Juergen K V Reichardt; Ronald K Ross; Malcolm C Pike; Laurence N Kolonel; Brian E Henderson Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2008-05-10 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Douglas K Price; Cindy H Chau; Cathee Till; Phyllis J Goodman; Robin J Leach; Teresa L Johnson-Pais; Ann W Hsing; Ashraful Hoque; Howard L Parnes; Jeannette M Schenk; Catherine M Tangen; Ian M Thompson; Juergen K V Reichardt; William D Figg Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jake Higgins; Michele Brogley; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Rohit Mehra; Michael M Ittmann; Jun Z Li; Scott A Tomlins; Diane M Robins Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: Philip J Lupo; Laura J Lee; M Fatih Okcu; Melissa L Bondy; Michael E Scheurer Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 3.167