Literature DB >> 16998387

Triage accuracy at a multiple casualty incident disaster drill: the Emergency Medical Service, Fire Department of New York City experience.

Josef D Schenker1, Steven Goldstein, James Braun, Andrew Werner, Frank Buccellato, Glenn Asaeda, David J Prezant.   

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the accuracy and speed for the triage of multiple patients during a disaster drill by Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel. During a disaster drill (train collision with blast injury and chemical release), the accuracy and speed of triage of 130 patient-actors by the Fire Department of New York City (FDNY) EMS personnel was evaluated using the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) triage system. All EMS personnel had been previously trained in START, but refresher training was not administered before the drill. Overall triage accuracy was 78%. In patients that had additional changes in their status during the triage process (injects), 62% were retriaged appropriately. Because of security and decontamination procedures, triage at the triage/treatment area began 40 minutes after the drill commenced. It took 2 hours and 38 minutes to completely clear the scene of all patients. On average, the time from the start of triage to transport was 1 hour and 2 minutes. Despite the fact that triage is a skill practiced by every EMS system in the country on a daily basis, few studies regarding triage accuracy are available. Limited data suggest that the triage accuracy rates using different triage strategy algorithms are approximately 45% to 55%. During this drill, FDNY-EMS triage accuracy using the START system exceeded these expectations. This study provides insight as to the triage experience of a large urban EMS system operating at a disaster drill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16998387     DOI: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000235450.12988.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  4 in total

1.  Utility of blood lactate level in triage.

Authors:  Yuichi Fukumoto; Yoshiaki Inoue; Yuji Takeuchi; Tetsuya Hoshino; Yuki Nakamura; Kohei Ishikawa; Miki Morikawa; Hiroshi Suginaka; Koichiro Sueyoshi; Yuka Sumi; Shigeru Matsuda; Ken Okamoto; Hiroshi Tanaka
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2015-08-17

Review 2.  Systematic review of strategies to manage and allocate scarce resources during mass casualty events.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Jeanne S Ringel; D Steven Fox; Francesca Pillemer; Daniel A Waxman; Melinda Moore; Cynthia K Hansen; Ann R Knebel; Richard Ricciardi; Arthur L Kellermann
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  A Qualitative Assessment of Studies Evaluating the Classification Accuracy of Personnel Using START in Disaster Triage: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Uirá Duarte Wisnesky; Scott W Kirkland; Brian H Rowe; Sandra Campbell; Jeffrey Michael Franc
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24

Review 4.  The development and features of the Spanish prehospital advanced triage method (META) for mass casualty incidents.

Authors:  Pedro Arcos González; Rafael Castro Delgado; Tatiana Cuartas Alvarez; Gracia Garijo Gonzalo; Carlos Martinez Monzon; Nieves Pelaez Corres; Alberto Rodriguez Soler; Fernando Turegano Fuentes
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.953

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.