OBJECTIVE: To define a group of patients with pancreatic cysts who do not require resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The increased use of cross-sectional imaging has resulted in an increased identification of small, asymptomatic pancreatic cysts. Data have not been available to determine which lesions should be resected. METHODS: All patients evaluated at our institution between January 1995 and January 2005 for the ICD-9 diagnosis of pancreatic cyst were reviewed. Analysis was performed to identify associations between patient and cyst characteristics, and selection of operative or nonoperative management. RESULTS: Pancreatic cysts were evaluated in 539 patients. Initial management was operative in 170 patients (32%), and nonoperative (radiographic follow-up) in 369 patients (68%). Factors associated with initial operative management included presence of a solid component (45% vs. 6%, P < 0.001), larger size of the lesion (mean 4.8 cm vs. 2.4 cm, P = 0.001), and presence of symptoms (44% vs. 16%, P = 0.001). Malignancy was present in 18% (32 of 170) of patients initially resected. Mucinous tumors (n = 18) were the most common malignant histologic subtype. None of the invasive cancers arising from mucinous cysts was <3 cm. Median radiographic follow-up in patients initially managed nonoperatively was 24 months (range, 1-172 months). In 29 patients (8%), changes developed within the cyst that resulted in resection; malignancy was present in 11 of 39 (38%), representing 3% (11 of 369) of all patients being followed radiographically. CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients with cystic lesions <3 cm in diameter and without a solid component may be followed radiographically with a malignancy risk (3% this study) that approximates the risk of mortality from resection. Malignancy within mucinous tumors is associated with size, and small mucinous tumors are very unlikely to be malignant.
OBJECTIVE: To define a group of patients with pancreatic cysts who do not require resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The increased use of cross-sectional imaging has resulted in an increased identification of small, asymptomatic pancreatic cysts. Data have not been available to determine which lesions should be resected. METHODS: All patients evaluated at our institution between January 1995 and January 2005 for the ICD-9 diagnosis of pancreatic cyst were reviewed. Analysis was performed to identify associations between patient and cyst characteristics, and selection of operative or nonoperative management. RESULTS:Pancreatic cysts were evaluated in 539 patients. Initial management was operative in 170 patients (32%), and nonoperative (radiographic follow-up) in 369 patients (68%). Factors associated with initial operative management included presence of a solid component (45% vs. 6%, P < 0.001), larger size of the lesion (mean 4.8 cm vs. 2.4 cm, P = 0.001), and presence of symptoms (44% vs. 16%, P = 0.001). Malignancy was present in 18% (32 of 170) of patients initially resected. Mucinous tumors (n = 18) were the most common malignant histologic subtype. None of the invasive cancers arising from mucinous cysts was <3 cm. Median radiographic follow-up in patients initially managed nonoperatively was 24 months (range, 1-172 months). In 29 patients (8%), changes developed within the cyst that resulted in resection; malignancy was present in 11 of 39 (38%), representing 3% (11 of 369) of all patients being followed radiographically. CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients with cystic lesions <3 cm in diameter and without a solid component may be followed radiographically with a malignancy risk (3% this study) that approximates the risk of mortality from resection. Malignancy within mucinous tumors is associated with size, and small mucinous tumors are very unlikely to be malignant.
Authors: William R Brugge; Gregory Y Lauwers; Dushyant Sahani; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-09-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Roberto Salvia; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Claudio Bassi; Sarah P Thayer; Massimo Falconi; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli; Andrew L Warshaw Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michael D'Angelica; Murray F Brennan; Arief A Suriawinata; David Klimstra; Kevin C Conlon Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Peter J Allen; David P Jaques; Michael D'Angelica; Wilbur B Bowne; Kevin C Conlon; Murray F Brennan Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: William R Brugge; Kent Lewandrowski; Elizabeth Lee-Lewandrowski; Barbara A Centeno; Tara Szydlo; Susan Regan; Carlos Fernandez del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Taylor A Sohn; Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Ralph H Hruban; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Kurtis A Campbell; Keith D Lillemoe Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Camilo Correa-Gallego; Cristina R Ferrone; Sarah P Thayer; Jennifer A Wargo; Andrew L Warshaw; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Nakul P Valsangkar; Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Sarah P Thayer; Cristina R Ferrone; Jennifer A Wargo; Andrew L Warshaw; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo Journal: Surgery Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Olca Basturk; Seung-Mo Hong; Laura D Wood; N Volkan Adsay; Jorge Albores-Saavedra; Andrew V Biankin; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Michael Goggins; Ralph H Hruban; Yo Kato; David S Klimstra; Günter Klöppel; Alyssa Krasinskas; Daniel S Longnecker; Hanno Matthaei; G Johan A Offerhaus; Michio Shimizu; Kyoichi Takaori; Benoit Terris; Shinichi Yachida; Irene Esposito; Toru Furukawa Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Rohit R Sharma; Mark J London; Laura L Magenta; Mitchell C Posner; Kevin K Roggin Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-06-10 Impact factor: 3.452