BACKGROUND: Mucins are large, hydrophilic glycoproteins that protect wet-surfaced epithelia from pathogen invasion as well as provide lubrication. At least 17 mucin genes have been cloned to date. This study sought to determine the mucin gene expression profile of the human male urogenital tract epithelia, to determine if mucins are present in seminal fluid and to assess the effect of androgens on mucin expression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Testis, epididymis, vas deferens, seminal vesicle, prostate, bladder, urethra and foreskin were assessed for mucin expression by RT-PCR (for 14 mucin genes) and immunohistochemistry (nine antibodies for five mucins). Epithelia of the vas deferens, prostate and urethra expressed the greatest number of mucins, each with mRNA for between 5 and 8 mucins. Except for MUC20 in epididymis, mRNA for MUC1 and MUC20, both membrane-associated mucins, was detected in all tissues analysed. By comparison, MUC6 was more restricted in expression, being primarily detected in seminal vesicle. MUC1, MUC5B and MUC6 were detected in seminal fluid samples by immunoblot analysis. Androgens had no effect on mucin expression in cultured human prostatic epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: Each region of urogenital tract epithelium expressed a unique mucin gene repertoire. Secretory mucins are present in seminal fluid, and androgens do not appear to regulate mucin gene expression in prostatic epithelial cells in culture.
BACKGROUND: Mucins are large, hydrophilic glycoproteins that protect wet-surfaced epithelia from pathogen invasion as well as provide lubrication. At least 17 mucin genes have been cloned to date. This study sought to determine the mucin gene expression profile of the human male urogenital tract epithelia, to determine if mucins are present in seminal fluid and to assess the effect of androgens on mucin expression. METHODS AND RESULTS:Testis, epididymis, vas deferens, seminal vesicle, prostate, bladder, urethra and foreskin were assessed for mucin expression by RT-PCR (for 14 mucin genes) and immunohistochemistry (nine antibodies for five mucins). Epithelia of the vas deferens, prostate and urethra expressed the greatest number of mucins, each with mRNA for between 5 and 8 mucins. Except for MUC20 in epididymis, mRNA for MUC1 and MUC20, both membrane-associated mucins, was detected in all tissues analysed. By comparison, MUC6 was more restricted in expression, being primarily detected in seminal vesicle. MUC1, MUC5B and MUC6 were detected in seminal fluid samples by immunoblot analysis. Androgens had no effect on mucin expression in cultured human prostatic epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: Each region of urogenital tract epithelium expressed a unique mucin gene repertoire. Secretory mucins are present in seminal fluid, and androgens do not appear to regulate mucin gene expression in prostatic epithelial cells in culture.
Authors: I K Gipson; R Moccia; S Spurr-Michaud; P Argüeso; A R Gargiulo; J A Hill; G D Offner; H T Keutmann Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: C A Reis; L David; P A Nielsen; H Clausen; K Mirgorodskaya; P Roepstorff; M Sobrinho-Simões Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 1997-02-20 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: E A Rossi; R R McNeer; S A Price-Schiavi; J M Van den Brande; M Komatsu; J F Thompson; C A Carraway; N L Fregien; K L Carraway Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1996-12-27 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Walter E Finkbeiner; Lorna T Zlock; Masatoshi Morikawa; Anna Y Lao; Vijay Dasari; Jonathan H Widdicombe Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Ying Luu; Wade Junker; Satyanarayana Rachagani; Srustidhar Das; Surinder K Batra; Robert L Heinrikson; Laurie L Shekels; Samuel B Ho Journal: Int J Biochem Cell Biol Date: 2010-03-06 Impact factor: 5.085
Authors: Gerard Cantero-Recasens; Cristian M Butnaru; Miguel A Valverde; José R Naranjo; Nathalie Brouwers; Vivek Malhotra Journal: Elife Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Biswadip Das; Melanie N Cash; Arthur R Hand; Armin Shivazad; Scott S Grieshaber; Bently Robinson; David J Culp Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.479