Literature DB >> 16997930

Increasing the efficiency of Monte Carlo cohort simulations with variance reduction techniques.

Steven M Shechter1, Andrew J Schaefer, R Scott Braithwaite, Mark S Roberts.   

Abstract

The authors discuss techniques for Monte Carlo (MC) cohort simulations that reduce the number of simulation replications required to achieve a given degree of precision for various output measures. Known as variance reduction techniques, they are often used in industrial engineering and operations research models, but they are seldom used in medical models. However, most MC cohort simulations are well suited to the implementation of these techniques. The authors discuss the cost of implementation versus the benefit of reduced replications.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16997930     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06290489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  10 in total

1.  Economic evaluations with agent-based modelling: an introduction.

Authors:  Jagpreet Chhatwal; Tianhua He
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The DYNAMO-HIA model: an efficient implementation of a risk factor/chronic disease Markov model for use in Health Impact Assessment (HIA).

Authors:  Hendriek C Boshuizen; Stefan K Lhachimi; Pieter H M van Baal; Rudolf T Hoogenveen; Henriette A Smit; Johan P Mackenbach; Wilma J Nusselder
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-11

3.  Using common random numbers in health care cost-effectiveness simulation modeling.

Authors:  Daniel R Murphy; Robert W Klein; Lee J Smolen; Timothy M Klein; Stephen D Roberts
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Assessing the relationship between computational speed and precision: a case study comparing an interpreted versus compiled programming language using a stochastic simulation model in diabetes care.

Authors:  Phil McEwan; Klas Bergenheim; Yong Yuan; Anthony P Tetlow; Jason P Gordon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Improving the efficiency of physical examination services.

Authors:  Wheyming Tina Song; Mingchang Chih; Aaron E Bair
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  The impact of inpatient boarding on ED efficiency: a discrete-event simulation study.

Authors:  Aaron E Bair; Wheyming T Song; Yi-Chun Chen; Beth A Morris
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Keeping the noise down: common random numbers for disease simulation modeling.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2008-12

8.  Comparison of Decision Modeling Approaches for Health Technology and Policy Evaluation.

Authors:  John Graves; Shawn Garbett; Zilu Zhou; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Josh Peterson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.749

9.  Can discrete event simulation be of use in modelling major depression?

Authors:  Agathe Le Lay; Nicolas Despiegel; Clément François; Gérard Duru
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2006-12-05

10.  Modeling human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in the United States for analyses of screening and vaccination.

Authors:  Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Natasha K Stout; Jesse Ortendahl; Karen M Kuntz; Sue J Goldie; Joshua A Salomon
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2007-10-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.