Literature DB >> 16997778

Path analysis modeling indicates free transport increases ambulance use for minor indications.

Joseph Yuk Sang Ting1, Allan M Z Chang.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Clinically unnecessary ambulance transport is increasing, diverting limited resources from patients needing ambulance transport. It was anecdotally observed that inappropriate ambulance use increased after abolition of a direct patient cost for ambulance transport. HYPOTHESIS: In July 2003, direct patient fees were abolished in favor of a universally applied ambulance levy, potentially leading to increased ambulance use by patients with low illness acuity and admission rates.
METHODS: The influence of age, illness acuity, and need for admission on ambulance use was assessed for 55,397 emergency department attendances in 2002 and 2004. Ambulance users were compared with nonusers in both years and attendances for 2002 compared with 2004 using chi-square test for two groups. Logistic regression provided a multivariate model leading to ambulance use. Path analysis modeling to assess interrelationships between factors associated with ambulance use was developed.
RESULTS: Ambulance users in both years were older, had more acute illness, and had greater need for admission compared with nonusers. The odds ratio (OR) of arrival by ambulance in 2004 compared with 2002 was 1.14 (95% confidence interval, [CI], 1.12 to 1.17). In 2002, ambulance users were older (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.40 to 1.43), were more likely to need admission (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 2.16 to 2.4) and had higher illness acuity (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.94 to 2.09). There was a negative correlation between 2004 and illness acuity.
CONCLUSIONS: Ambulance use increased in 2004 after patient transport fees were abolished. Increased use was associated with decreased age, clinical acuity, and admission need. Abolishing direct patient cost stimulates ambulance use, potentially including inappropriate transport. Path analysis to assess the effect of changed funding on ambulance use could be used to the influence of other locally relevant factors contributing to ambulance use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16997778     DOI: 10.1080/10903120600885209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  5 in total

1.  The potential adverse patient effects of ambulance ramping, a relatively new problem at the interface between prehospital and ED care.

Authors:  Joseph Ys Ting
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2008-07

2.  Physiological-social scores in predicting outcomes of prehospital internal patients.

Authors:  Abbasali Ebrahimian; Hesam Seyedin; Roohangiz Jamshidi-Orak; Gholamreza Masoumi
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 1.112

3.  Exploring Factors Affecting Emergency Medical Services Staffs' Decision about Transporting Medical Patients to Medical Facilities.

Authors:  Abbasali Ebrahimian; Hesam Seyedin; Roohangiz Jamshidi-Orak; Gholamreza Masoumi
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 1.112

4.  Inappropriate Ambulance Use: A Qualitative Study of Paramedics' Views.

Authors:  Deirdre Dejean; Mita Giacomini; Michelle Welsford; Lisa Schwartz; Philip Decicca
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-02

5.  Hospital emergency department visits by ambulance for nontraumatic tooth pain in the USA.

Authors:  Jonathan D Shenkin; John Warren; Charles Spanbauer; Elaye Okunseri; Aniko Szabo; Christopher Okunseri
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.