L Nelson1, M Boyle, I Taggart, S Watson. 1. Glasgow Royal Infirmary Burns Unit, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow G4 0SF, United Kingdom.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Routine photography of all patients admitted to the West of Scotland Regional Burns Unit was introduced in 2003. To date, there are few burns units to evaluate the usefulness of photographs taken. AIM: To assess the usefulness of photographs of patients admitted to the burns unit to various members of the multidisciplinary team. METHOD: A questionnaire was completed by hospital staff involved in the management of burns patients over a 3-month period. A total of 43 questionnaires were completed. RESULTS: The majority of questionnaires were completed by nursing staff (55%) followed by medical staff (23%); physiotherapy (5%); anaesthetists (7%); theatre staff (5%); students (2%); dietician (2%). About 98% of respondents agreed that photographs were useful overall, particularly for teaching purposes. About 9% disagreed that photographs were useful for assessment due to difficulty in assessing depth of burn. About 72% agreed that the photographs were useful for patient management and improve patient care. About 88% agreed that all patients should have photographs available in future. Advantages of photographs include; moving and handling of patients; patient positioning in theatre; reviewing wound healing and complications. They are useful for assessing site, size and type of burn. Disadvantages include difficulty in assessing depth of burn, technical factors, and unavailability out of hours. CONCLUSIONS: Photographs of burns patients are useful overall to all members of the multidisciplinary team.
UNLABELLED: Routine photography of all patients admitted to the West of Scotland Regional Burns Unit was introduced in 2003. To date, there are few burns units to evaluate the usefulness of photographs taken. AIM: To assess the usefulness of photographs of patients admitted to the burns unit to various members of the multidisciplinary team. METHOD: A questionnaire was completed by hospital staff involved in the management of burns patients over a 3-month period. A total of 43 questionnaires were completed. RESULTS: The majority of questionnaires were completed by nursing staff (55%) followed by medical staff (23%); physiotherapy (5%); anaesthetists (7%); theatre staff (5%); students (2%); dietician (2%). About 98% of respondents agreed that photographs were useful overall, particularly for teaching purposes. About 9% disagreed that photographs were useful for assessment due to difficulty in assessing depth of burn. About 72% agreed that the photographs were useful for patient management and improve patient care. About 88% agreed that all patients should have photographs available in future. Advantages of photographs include; moving and handling of patients; patient positioning in theatre; reviewing wound healing and complications. They are useful for assessing site, size and type of burn. Disadvantages include difficulty in assessing depth of burn, technical factors, and unavailability out of hours. CONCLUSIONS: Photographs of burns patients are useful overall to all members of the multidisciplinary team.
Authors: Laura C Siegwart; Arne H Böcker; Yannick F Diehm; Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer; Stella Erdmann; Benjamin Ziegler; Ulrich Kneser; Christoph Hirche; Sebastian Fischer Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 1.845