Literature DB >> 16997480

Use of Transcyte and dermabrasion to treat burns reduces length of stay in burns of all size and etiology.

Hamed Amani1, William R Dougherty, Sigrid Blome-Eberwein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the cost of healthcare increasing, greater emphasis is placed on finding better ways to manage burn patients by increasing the quality of care while reducing length of hospital stay (LOS), thereby reducing overall cost. To date, this is the largest study to determine if Transcyte reduces LOS for partial thickness burns of any size or etiology.
METHODS: All consecutive patients with deep partial thickness burns from April 2002 to December 2002 were reviewed (n=110) with IRB approval. Ninety-two patients were treated with dermabrasion and Transcyte only. Eighteen patients were treated with a combination of STSG and dermabrasion and Transcyte where appropriate. Our data was compared to the American Burn Association Patient Registry, as reported by Saffle et al. 1995.
RESULTS: The data for percent TBSA and LOS are reported as mean+/-S.E.M. One-tailed t-test was used to analyze the data. Significant difference was found in patients who were treated with dermabrasion and Transcyte compared to the population reported by Saffle et al. Patients with 0-19.9% TBSA burn treated with dermabrasion and Transcyte had LOS of 6.1 days versus 9.0 days (p<0.001). Those with 20-39.9% TBSA burn had length of stay of 17.5 days versus 25.5 days. Patients treated with STSG and Transcyte who had 40-59.9% TBSA burn had length of stay of 39.7 days versus 44.6 days. Those treated with dermabrasion and Transcyte alone had length of stay of 31 days.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study comparing burns of all sizes treated with dermabrasion and Transcyte with a known population receiving standard therapy. The authors found this new method of managing patients with partial thickness burns to be more efficacious and significantly reduces length of stay compared to traditional management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16997480     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2006.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  5 in total

Review 1.  Topical antimicrobials for burn wound infections.

Authors:  T Dai; Y Y Huang; S K Sharma; J T Hashmi; D B Kurup; M R Hamblin
Journal:  Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov       Date:  2010-06

2.  The life-cycles of skin replacement technologies.

Authors:  Mihail Climov; Adriana C Panayi; Gregory Borah; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effect of precise partial scab removal on the repair of deep partial-thickness burn wounds in children: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yunfei Chi; Huinan Yin; Xin Chen; Quan Hu; Wei Liu; Li Feng; Jiake Chai
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-11

Review 4.  Wound Healing: Biologics, Skin Substitutes, Biomembranes and Scaffolds.

Authors:  Krishna S Vyas; Henry C Vasconez
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-10

5.  Holistic Approach of Swiss Fetal Progenitor Cell Banking: Optimizing Safe and Sustainable Substrates for Regenerative Medicine and Biotechnology.

Authors:  Alexis Laurent; Nathalie Hirt-Burri; Corinne Scaletta; Murielle Michetti; Anthony S de Buys Roessingh; Wassim Raffoul; Lee Ann Applegate
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.