Literature DB >> 16997400

Radiation exposure during follow-up of adults with congenital heart disease.

Andreas Hoffmann1, Peter Engelfriet, Barbara Mulder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adult patients with congenital heart disease under follow-up often need to undergo diagnostic procedures which expose them to radiation. AIM: To evaluate radiation doses in adult patients with congenital heart disease during follow-up.
METHODS: Data on diagnostic procedures were used from the European Heart Survey on adult congenital heart disease, a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Lesions included in the survey were Atrial Septal Defect, Ventricular Septal Defect, Fallot, Fontan, Coarctation, Transposition of the Great Arteries, Marfan, and Cyanotic lesions. A total of 4110 patients (52% female) with a mean age of 32 years (range 17-85) were included. The follow-up time ranged from 0 to 72 months, with a median of 61 months. There were a total of 18,403 patient-years of follow-up. During this time, a mean of 4.5 visits per patient took place. Radiation doses were calculated using the number of examinations in each patient's data file. Effective radiation doses are given in millisievert (mSv).
RESULTS: The average cumulative annual effective dose per patient was 0.46 mSv. The relative contributions to these doses were 3% by chest X-rays, 39% by computed tomography scans, 42% by angiography, and 16% by nuclear scans. Effective doses were higher in patients with Fontan, Coarctation, Marfan and Cyanotic lesions, as well as in patients with Atrial Septal Defects.
CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to radiation during follow-up of patients with adult congenital heart disease mainly stems from computed tomography scans and angiography. Patients with Fontan, Coarctation, Marfan and Cyanotic lesions are more likely to get high doses from computed tomography. In these lesions, therefore, particular care should be taken to use non-ionizing imaging procedures whenever possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16997400     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  8 in total

1.  Coronary artery assessment using self-navigated free-breathing radial whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography in patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Moritz H Albrecht; Akos Varga-Szemes; U Joseph Schoepf; Georg Apfaltrer; Jiaqian Xu; Kwang-Nam Jin; Anthony M Hlavacek; Shahryar M Chowdhury; Pal Suranyi; Christian Tesche; Carlo N De Cecco; Davide Piccini; Matthias Stuber; Giulia Ginami; Thomas J Vogl; Arni Nutting
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging of congenital heart disease in adults.

Authors:  Sonya V Babu-Narayan; George Giannakoulas; Anne Marie Valente; Wei Li; Michael A Gatzoulis
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Radiation dosage during pediatric diagnostic or interventional cardiac catheterizations using the "air gap technique" and an aggressive "as low as reasonably achievable" radiation reduction protocol in patients weighing <20 kg.

Authors:  Frank A Osei; Joshua Hayman; Nicole J Sutton; Robert H Pass
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

4.  Sodium Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate Prevents Radiation-Induced Toxicity in H9c2 Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Wenjing Zhang; Yi Li; Rui Li; Yaya Wang; Mengwen Zhu; Bowen Wang; Yanling Li; Dongyun Li; Ping Xie; Bin Liu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 5.  EDUCATIONAL SERIES IN CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: Cardiovascular MRI and CT in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Kuberan Pushparajah; Phuoc Duong; Sujeev Mathur; Sonya Babu-Narayan
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2019-10-01

6.  Comparison of pulmonary artery dimensions in swine obtained from catheter angiography, multi-slice computed tomography, 3D-rotational angiography and phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Ryan Pewowaruk; Klarka Mendrisova; Carolina Larrain; Christopher J Francois; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Luke Lamers
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  3D Approaches in Complex CHD: Where Are We? Funny Printing and Beautiful Images, or a Useful Tool?

Authors:  Adriani Spanaki; Saleha Kabir; Natasha Stephenson; Milou P M van Poppel; Valentina Benetti; John Simpson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-08-15

8.  Size and function of the atria.

Authors:  B J M Mulder; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.357

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.