Literature DB >> 16997126

Root canal microbiota of dogs' teeth with periapical lesions induced by two different methods.

Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade Ferreira1, Helena Rosa Campos Rabang, Ericka Tavares Pinheiro, Cícero Romão Gadê-Neto, Alexandre Augusto Zaia, Caio Cezar Randi Ferraz, Francisco José de Souza-Filho, Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida Gomes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The microbial composition was investigated in root canals of dogs' teeth with periapical lesions induced by 2 different methods: open versus sealed canals. STUDY
DESIGN: Teeth from Group I (n = 16) were left open for a week, then sealed with composite resin for 120 days. The teeth from Group II (n = 16) were left open for the same period. Microbiological samples from the root canals were collected and processed by the anaerobic technique for identification and counting of microorganisms after establishment of periapical reactions.
RESULTS: Seventy-four cultivable isolates were recovered in sealed canals (Group I). Strict anaerobes accounted for 64.9% of all species isolated, and gram-negative microorganisms accounted for 55.4%. Microbial genera most frequently isolated were Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Clostridium, and Porphyromonas. Statistical analysis by Pearson chi-square or Fisher's test revealed positive association between sealed teeth and strict anaerobes (P < .05). In open canals (Group II), from a total of 58 cultivable isolates, 19% were strict anaerobes and 81% facultative anaerobes, with predominance of gram-positive species (75.8%). Genera most frequently isolated were Streptococcus, Propionibacterium, Staphylococcus, Neisseria, and Prevotella.
CONCLUSION: Strict anaerobes were most frequently found in sealed teeth rather than in the teeth with canals left exposed to the oral cavity for 4 months. Therefore, the method that induced periapical inflammatory lesions by intentional oral exposure, followed by tooth sealing, produced root canal microbiota similar to the same found in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16997126     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Changin Oh; Kunkyu Lee; Yeotaek Cheong; Sang-Won Lee; Seung-Yong Park; Chang-Seon Song; In-Soo Choi; Joong-Bok Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Enterococcal Infective Endocarditis following Periodontal Disease in Dogs.

Authors:  Teresa Semedo-Lemsaddek; Marta Tavares; Berta São Braz; Luís Tavares; Manuela Oliveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Endodontic Microbiome of Fractured Non-vital Teeth in Dogs Determined by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.

Authors:  Marjory Xavier Rodrigues; Ana Nemec; Nadine Fiani; Rodrigo C Bicalho; Santiago Peralta
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-10-09

4.  An experimental intraradicular biofilm model in the pig for evaluating irrigation techniques.

Authors:  Toshinori Tanaka; Yoshio Yahata; Keisuke Handa; Suresh V Venkataiah; Mary M Njuguna; Masafumi Kanehira; Tatsuya Hasegawa; Yuichiro Noiri; Masahiro Saito
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  A critical analysis of research methods and biological experimental models to study pulp regeneration.

Authors:  Vinicius Rosa; Gopu Sriram; Neville McDonald; Bruno Neves Cavalcanti
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.165

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.