Literature DB >> 16996846

Survival in octogenarians receiving implantable defibrillators.

Bruce A Koplan1, Laurence M Epstein, Christine M Albert, William G Stevenson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials have expanded implantable defibrillator (ICD) indications, octogenarians have been poorly represented in these studies. Overall, survival in this subgroup is ill-defined.
METHODS: Consecutive patients > or = 80 years of age at ICD implant between July 1995 and September 2003 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, and mortality predictors were identified. Consecutive nonelderly patients aged 60 to 70 years (60-70 group) who received ICDs over the same period were analyzed as a reference. Mortality predictors in the > or = 80 group were compared to the 60-to-70 group.
RESULTS: A total of 348 patients (age, > or = 80 years [n = 107]; age, 60-70 years [n = 241]) were included. Mean follow-up time for the entire cohort was 3.3 +/- 2.2 years. Other than the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (58 +/- 22 vs 66 +/- 22 mL/min) in the > or = 80 group versus the 60-to-70 group, no other differences in baseline characteristics were observed. Median survival was 4.2 years after implant in the > or = 80 group versus 7 years in the 60-to-70 group (P < .01). Mortality predictors in the > or = 80 group included ejection fraction (EF) < or = 30% (hazard ratio [HR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.0) and eGFR < 60 mL/min (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.7). In the 60-to-70 group, EF < or = 30% (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.5), eGFR < 60 mL/min (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.2-5.3), diabetes (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.9-2.9), and QRS width > 120 ms (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.3) predicted mortality. QRS > 120 ms and diabetes were not predictors in octogenarians (HR, 1.1 and 1.5, respectively; 95% CI, 0.7-1.9 and 0.8-2.7, respectively). Analysis of octogenarians subgrouped by EF < or = 30% and eGFR < 60 mL/min identified patients whose median survival was 6.1 years (neither predictor present; n = 28), 4.7 years (either predictor present; n = 46), and 19 months (both predictors present; n = 33) (P < .01 between groups). Survival analysis in the > or = 80-year-old cohort grouped by eGFR quartile identified groups with median survival of 5.6, 4.7, 3.5 years, and 18 months, respectively, in the highest to the lowest eGFR quartile (> 75, 61-75, 41-60, and < 41 mL/min).
CONCLUSIONS: Median survival in octogenarian ICD recipients is greater than 4 years. In addition to baseline EF, eGFR is a strong predictor of mortality in elderly ICD candidates. These easily identifiable clinical variables may assist clinical decision making and help to provide appropriate post-ICD implant survival expectations in this elderly patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16996846     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  13 in total

1.  Subject of the year: who are we missing, who are we overtreating, and who is best served? Refining the prescription of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  Andrew E Epstein
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  [ICD therapy in the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: Risk stratification and patient selection].

Authors:  J Neuzner; R Gradaus
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-06-04

3.  Changing nature of cardiac interventions in older adults.

Authors:  John A Dodson; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Aging health       Date:  2011-04

4.  Impact of baseline heart failure burden on post-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator mortality among medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Chih-Ying Chen; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Garrick C Stewart; John D Seeger; Lauren Williams; Jessica J Jalbert; Soko Setoguchi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Arrhythmias in Patients ≥80 Years of Age: Pathophysiology, Management, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Anne B Curtis; Roshan Karki; Alexander Hattoum; Umesh C Sharma
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Impact of advanced age on survival in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Cara N Pellegrini; Keane Lee; Jeffrey E Olgin; Mintu P Turakhia; Zian H Tseng; Randall Lee; Nitish Badhwar; Byron Lee; Paul D Varosy
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  ICD Implantation in Patients With Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Jaydutt B Patel; Bruce A Koplan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-02

8.  Ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Bruce A Koplan; William G Stevenson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  What is The Utility of Electrophysiological Study in Elderly Patients with Syncope and Heart Disease?

Authors:  Rumas Aslam; Nicolas Girerd; Beatrice Brembilla-Perrot
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2015-04-01

10.  ICDs at higher age and clinical risk factors.

Authors:  W Anné; D A M J Theuns; B Schaer; Y Van Belle; T Szili-Torok; T Smith; J Res; L Jordaens
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.