Literature DB >> 16996832

Underuse of evidence-based treatment partly explains the worse clinical outcome in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Raymond T Yan1, Andrew T Yan, Mary Tan, Darren K McGuire, Lawrence Leiter, David H Fitchett, Claude Lauzon, Kevin Lai, Chi-Ming Chow, Anatoly Langer, Shaun G Goodman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes-related differences in treatment and clinical outcome of patients across the entire spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) have potential clinical implications but have not been well studied.
METHODS: The multicenter, prospective, Canadian ACS Registry enrolled 4578 patients hospitalized for ACS between 1999 and 2001 across 9 provinces in Canada. We compared baseline characteristics, in-hospital and post-discharge treatments, and clinical outcome of diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The impact of diabetes on use of thrombolytic therapy and coronary revascularization; and the independent association between diabetes, treatments, and diabetes-treatment interactions on outcome were examined.
RESULTS: Diabetic patients with ACS had more cardiovascular risk factors and higher-risk clinical presentation. They paradoxically received less evidence-based medications in-hospital, at discharge, and at 1-year. Although diabetes independently predicted higher 1-year mortality (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.15-1.87; P = .002) after adjustment for validated prognosticators, it was also an independent predictor of not receiving thrombolytic therapy (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.95; P = .021) and coronary revascularization (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.82; P < .001). These underused therapies were all independently associated with reduced 1-year mortality, with no significant diabetes-related treatment-outcome heterogeneity. Importantly, diabetes remained an independent adverse prognosticator even after further adjustment for these differences in treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based therapies are underused in the contemporary management of diabetic patients with ACS, which partly explains their worse outcome. Diabetes should be considered a high-risk feature in ACS risk stratification that encourages more intensive treatments. Continued efforts to promote adherence to existing proven therapies and to develop novel treatment strategies targeting diabetes-specific cardiovascular pathophysiology are imperative to improve their adverse prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16996832     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  8 in total

1.  Usefulness of diabetes mellitus to predict long-term outcomes in patients with unstable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Michael E Farkouh; Ashish Aneja; Guy S Reeder; Peter A Smars; Ryan J Lennon; Heather J Wiste; Kay Traverse; Louai Razzouk; Ananda Basu; David R Holmes; Verghese Mathew
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Relationship of dysglycemia to acute myocardial infarct size and cardiovascular outcome as determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Adam N Mather; Andrew Crean; Nik Abidin; Gillian Worthy; Stephen G Ball; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 3.  Modulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors for therapeutic benefit? Biology, clinical experience, and future prospects.

Authors:  Robert S Rosenson; R Scott Wright; Michael Farkouh; Jorge Plutzky
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Objective Risk Assessment vs Standard Care for Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Derek P Chew; Karice Hyun; Erin Morton; Matt Horsfall; Graham S Hillis; Clara K Chow; Stephen Quinn; Mario D'Souza; Andrew T Yan; Chris P Gale; Shaun G Goodman; Keith Fox; David Brieger
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 14.676

5.  Underuse of an invasive strategy for patients with diabetes with acute coronary syndrome: a nationwide study.

Authors:  Ida Gustafsson; Anders Hvelplund; Kim Wadt Hansen; Søren Galatius; Mette Madsen; Jan Skov Jensen; Hans-Henrik Tilsted; Christian Juhl Terkelsen; Lisette Okkels Jensen; Erik Jørgensen; Jan Kyst Madsen; Steen Zabell Abildstrøm
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-02-06

Review 6.  Antithrombotic therapy for long-term secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Steen Husted
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Impact of text messages in a middle-income country to promote secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome (IMPACS): A randomized trial.

Authors:  Luiz Guilherme Passaglia; Luisa Campos Caldeira Brant; Bruno Ramos Nascimento; Antônio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Association between in-hospital guideline adherence and postdischarge major adverse outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome in Vietnam: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Thang Nguyen; Khanh K Le; Hoang T K Cao; Dao T T Tran; Linh M Ho; Trang N D Thai; Hoa T K Pham; Phong T Pham; Thao H Nguyen; Eelko Hak; Tam T Pham; Katja Taxis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.