Literature DB >> 16995638

Disturbance influences oyster community richness and evenness, but not diversity.

David L Kimbro1, Edwin D Grosholz.   

Abstract

Foundation species in space-limited systems can increase diversity by creating habitat, but they may also reduce diversity by excluding primary space competitors. These contrasting forces of increasing associate diversity and suppressing competitor diversity have rarely been examined experimentally with respect to disturbance. In a benthic marine community in central California, where native oysters are a foundation species, we tested how disturbance influenced overall species richness, evenness, and diversity. Surprisingly, overall diversity did not peak across a disturbance gradient because, as disturbance decreased, decreases in overall species evenness opposed increases in overall species richness. Decreasing disturbance intensity (high oyster abundance) led to increasing species richness of sessile and mobile species combined. This increase was due to the facilitation of secondary sessile and mobile species in the presence of oysters. In contrast, decreasing disturbance intensity and high oyster abundance decreased the evenness of sessile and mobile species. Three factors likely contributed to this decreased evenness: oysters reduced abundances of primary sessile species due to space competition; oysters supported more rare mobile species; and oysters disproportionately increased the relative abundance of a few common mobile species. Our results highlight the need for further studies on how disturbance can differentially affect the evenness and richness of different functional groups, and ultimately how these differences affect the relationship between overall diversity and ecosystem function.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16995638     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2378:diocra]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  Inducible defenses in Olympia oysters in response to an invasive predator.

Authors:  Jillian M Bible; Kaylee R Griffith; Eric Sanford
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Invasive species cause large-scale loss of native California oyster habitat by disrupting trophic cascades.

Authors:  David L Kimbro; Edwin D Grosholz; Adam J Baukus; Nicholas J Nesbitt; Nicole M Travis; Sarikka Attoe; Caitlin Coleman-Hulbert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Atmospheric rivers and the mass mortality of wild oysters: insight into an extreme future?

Authors:  Brian S Cheng; Andrew L Chang; Anna Deck; Matthew C Ferner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Biogenic gradients in algal density affect the emergent properties of spatially self-organized mussel beds.

Authors:  Quan-Xing Liu; Ellen J Weerman; Rohit Gupta; Peter M J Herman; Han Olff; Johan van de Koppel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Non-linear density-dependent effects of an intertidal ecosystem engineer.

Authors:  Christopher D G Harley; Jaclyn L O'Riley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested?

Authors:  J Robin Svensson; Mats Lindegarth; Per R Jonsson; Henrik Pavia
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Conservation aquaculture as a tool for imperiled marine species: Evaluation of opportunities and risks for Olympia oysters, Ostrea lurida.

Authors:  April D Ridlon; Kerstin Wasson; Tiffany Waters; John Adams; Jamie Donatuto; Gary Fleener; Halley Froehlich; Rhona Govender; Aaron Kornbluth; Julio Lorda; Betsy Peabody; Gifford Pinchot Iv; Steven S Rumrill; Elizabeth Tobin; Chela J Zabin; Danielle Zacherl; Edwin D Grosholz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.