Literature DB >> 16995618

Brood production and lineage discrimination in the red harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex barbatus).

Veronica P Volny1, Michael J Greene, Deborah M Gordon.   

Abstract

In contrast to the system of caste determination in most social insects, reproductive caste determination in some populations of Pogonomyrmex barbatus has a genetic basis. Populations that exhibit genetic caste determination are segregated into two distinct, genetic lineages. Same-lineage matings result in female reproductives, while inter-lineage matings result in workers. To investigate whether founding P. barbatus queens lay eggs of reproductive genotype, and to determine the fate of those eggs, we genotyped eggs, larvae, and pupae produced by naturally inseminated, laboratory-raised queens. We show that founding dependent lineage queens do lay eggs of reproductive genotype, and that the proportion of reproductive genotypes decreases over the course of development from eggs to larvae to pupae. Because queens must mate with a male of each lineage to produce both workers and female reproductives, it would benefit queens to be able to distinguish males of the two lineages. Here we show that P. barbatus males from the two genetic lineages differ in their cuticular hydrocarbon profiles. Queens could use male cuticular hydrocarbons as cues to assess the lineage of males at the mating aggregation, and possibly keep mating until they have mated with males of both lineages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16995618     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2194:bpaldi]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  4 in total

Review 1.  Review. Lifelong commitment to the wrong partner: hybridization in ants.

Authors:  Heike Feldhaar; Susanne Foitzik; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Intergenerational effect of juvenile hormone on offspring in Pogonomyrmex harvester ants.

Authors:  Sara Helms Cahan; Christopher J Graves; Colin S Brent
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Inter-genomic sexual conflict drives antagonistic coevolution in harvester ants.

Authors:  Michael Herrmann; Sara Helms Cahan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population?

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon; Anna Pilko; Nicolas De Bortoli; Krista K Ingram
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.