Literature DB >> 16995546

Measurement of contrast sensitivity and glare under mesopic and photopic conditions following wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK surgery.

Hyung Keun Lee1, Chul Myung Choe, Kyoung Tak Ma, Eung Kweon Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare contrast and glare vision in a prospective study of eyes treated using conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK surgery. The reproducibility of a glaremeter device used to quantitatively measure glare and halo was also determined.
METHODS: Ninety-two eyes of 46 patients underwent conventional LASIK surgery and 104 eyes of 52 patients underwent wavefront-guided LASIK surgery. Visual acuity, glare disability measured using a glaremeter, and contrast sensitivity assessed using a Pelli-Robson chart were measured monthly for 6 months postoperatively. Glaremeter testing was performed under both mesopic (5.4 +/- 0.4 cd/m2) and photopic (78.3 +/- 4.4 cd/m2) conditions. To evaluate the reproducibility of the glaremeter, 36 eyes of 18 nonoperated myopic patients were tested.
RESULTS: The coefficient of variation and the reliability coefficient for the glare test were 13.6% and 95.2%, respectively. The glaremeter showed that glare disability under mesopic conditions differed between conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK eyes over 6-month follow-up (907.5 +/- 491.5 vs 986.1 +/- 448.0 pixels preoperatively and 1717.1 +/- 521.2 vs 1407.8 +/- 411.3 pixels at 6 months, P<.0001). At 6 months, contrast sensitivity log values were 1.62 +/- 0.31 and 1.78 +/- 0.34 for conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK eyes, respectively (P=.010). The visual complaint score was lower in the wavefront-guided LASIK group (P=.0116).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional ablation, wavefront-guided ablation provided superior outcomes in terms of postoperative glare under mesopic conditions, subjective complaints, and contrast sensitivity. In addition, it appears the glaremeter can be used for clinical quantitative evaluation of glare and halo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16995546     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060901-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  7 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of night vision and correlation of refractive and topographical parameters with glare after orthokeratology.

Authors:  Takashi Kojima; Asato Hasegawa; Syuya Hara; Rie Horai; Yoko Yoshida; Tomoaki Nakamura; Murat Dogru; Kazuo Ichikawa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Relation of Corneal Astigmatism with Various Corneal Image Quality Parameters in a Large Cohort of Naïve Corneas.

Authors:  Mohamed Omar Yousif; Rania Serag Elkitkat; Noha Abdelsadek Alaarag; Abdelrhman Shams; Hesham Mohamed Gharieb
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-04

3.  Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors.

Authors:  Shi-Ming Li; Meng-Tian Kang; Ning-Li Wang; Samuel A Abariga
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  A prospective comparison of phakic collamer lenses and wavefront-optimized laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia.

Authors:  Gregory D Parkhurst
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-29

5.  Refractive and Aberration Outcomes after Customized Photorefractive Keratectomy in Comparison with Customized Femtosecond Laser.

Authors:  Valleh Sajjadi; Mohammad Ghoreishi; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2015

Review 6.  Outcome comparison between wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Khaled M Hamam; Mohamed I Gbreel; Randa Elsheikh; Amira Y Benmelouka; Yassamine Ouerdane; Amr K Hassan; Aboalmagd Hamdallah; Ahmed B Elsnhory; Anas Z Nourelden; Ahmed T Masoud; Asmaa A Ali; Khaled M Ragab; Ahmed M Ibrahim
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects.

Authors:  Takahiro Hiraoka; Sujin Hoshi; Yoshifumi Okamoto; Fumiki Okamoto; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.