OBJECTIVE: Gastric contents empty from the stomach despite frequent changes in body position. The mechanism that maintains gastric emptying independent of position is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of body position on gastric emptying and motor function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve volunteers were investigated in seated position (SP) and upside-down position (UDP) after ingestion of 300 ml water. Magnetic resonance imaging provided a non-invasive assessment of gastric emptying and volumes, intragastric distribution and peristaltic function. RESULTS: A marked difference in distal/proximal intragastric distribution between UDP and SP was present (7% versus 40%; p < 0.01). Gastric-emptying time was similar but emptying pattern was linear in UDP and exponential in SP. Peristalsis was slower in UDP than SP (2.75 versus 2.96 min-1; p < 0.01), but no correlation was found between peristaltic frequency and the rate of gastric emptying in either position. Postprandial volume response (gastric relaxation) was greater in UDP than SP (280 versus 250 ml; p < 0.05). A correlation was found between gastric relaxation and gastric-emptying time in SP (r2=0.46) but not in UDP. CONCLUSIONS: The stomach maintains the rate of gastric emptying despite radical changes in body position and intragastric distribution of gastric contents. In SP, hydrostatic pressure (modulated by gastric tone) dictates the gastric emptying. In UDP, gastric emptying also appears to be mediated by continuous adaptation of gastric tone. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that the mechanism of gastric emptying resembles a "pressure pump" rather than a "peristaltic pump".
OBJECTIVE: Gastric contents empty from the stomach despite frequent changes in body position. The mechanism that maintains gastric emptying independent of position is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of body position on gastric emptying and motor function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve volunteers were investigated in seated position (SP) and upside-down position (UDP) after ingestion of 300 ml water. Magnetic resonance imaging provided a non-invasive assessment of gastric emptying and volumes, intragastric distribution and peristaltic function. RESULTS: A marked difference in distal/proximal intragastric distribution between UDP and SP was present (7% versus 40%; p < 0.01). Gastric-emptying time was similar but emptying pattern was linear in UDP and exponential in SP. Peristalsis was slower in UDP than SP (2.75 versus 2.96 min-1; p < 0.01), but no correlation was found between peristaltic frequency and the rate of gastric emptying in either position. Postprandial volume response (gastric relaxation) was greater in UDP than SP (280 versus 250 ml; p < 0.05). A correlation was found between gastric relaxation and gastric-emptying time in SP (r2=0.46) but not in UDP. CONCLUSIONS: The stomach maintains the rate of gastric emptying despite radical changes in body position and intragastric distribution of gastric contents. In SP, hydrostatic pressure (modulated by gastric tone) dictates the gastric emptying. In UDP, gastric emptying also appears to be mediated by continuous adaptation of gastric tone. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that the mechanism of gastric emptying resembles a "pressure pump" rather than a "peristaltic pump".
Authors: Andrew P Ault; Diana I Stark; Jessica L Axson; Justin N Keeney; Andrew D Maynard; Ingrid L Bergin; Martin A Philbert Journal: Environ Sci Nano Date: 2016-11-09
Authors: Meher Prakash; Ron Fried; Oliver Götze; Francisca May; Petra Frings-Meuthen; Edwin Mulder; Judit Valentini; Mark Fox; Michael Fried; Werner Schwizer; Benjamin Misselwitz Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: C L Hoad; H Parker; N Hudders; C Costigan; E F Cox; A C Perkins; P E Blackshaw; L Marciani; R C Spiller; M R Fox; P A Gowland Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Andreas Steingoetter; Matthias Sauter; Jelena Curcic; Dian Liu; Dieter Menne; Michael Fried; Mark Fox; Werner Schwizer Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: L Marciani; S E Pritchard; C Hellier-Woods; C Costigan; C L Hoad; P A Gowland; R C Spiller Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 4.016