Literature DB >> 16989936

Effectiveness and long-term outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in paediatric intensive care units in Spain.

Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez1, Jesús López-Herce, Cristina García, Angel Carrillo, Pedro Domínguez, Custodio Calvo, Miguel Angel Delgado.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the immediate effectiveness of resuscitation and long-term outcome of children who suffered a cardiorespiratory arrest when admitted to paediatric intensive care units (PICU). DESIGN AND
SETTING: Secondary analysis of data from an 18-month prospective, multicentre study analysing cardiorespiratory arrest in children in 16 paediatric intensive care units in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 116 children between 7 days and 17 years of age. Data were recorded according to the Utstein style. Analysed outcome variables were sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge and survival at 1 year. Neurological and general performance outcome was assessed by means of the Paediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) and the Paediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) scales.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: In 80 patients (69%) ROSC was achieved and it was sustained > 20 min in 69 (59.5%). At one-year follow-up, 40 children (34.5%) were alive. Survival was not associated with sex, age or weight of patients. Mortality from cardiac arrest was higher than respiratory arrest (69.8% versus 40%, p = 0.01). Patients with sepsis had a higher mortality than other diagnostic groups. Mechanically ventilated children and those treated with vasoactive drugs had a higher mortality. Initial mortality was slightly higher in patients with slow ECG rhythms (35.7%) compared to those with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) (27.2%). Duration of resuscitation effort was correlated with mortality (p < 0.0001). Patients who required one or more doses of adrenaline had also a higher mortality (77.8% versus 20.7%, p < 0.0001) and survivors needed less doses of adrenaline (0.85 +/- 1.14 versus 4.4+/-2.9, p < 0.0001). At hospital discharge 86.8 and 84.6% of patients had scores 1 or 2 (normal or near-normal) in the PCPC and POPC scales. At 1-year follow-up these figures were 90.8 and 86.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: One-third of children who suffer a cardiac or respiratory arrest when admitted to PICU survive, and most of them had a good long-term neurological and functional outcome. The duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts is the best indicator of mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16989936     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  17 in total

1.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Is "Good Neurologic Outcome" Following Cardiac Arrest Good Enough?

Authors:  Matthew P Kirschen; Alexis A Topjian
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.624

4.  Hemodynamic, respiratory, and perfusion parameters during asphyxia, resuscitation, and post-resuscitation in a pediatric model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jesús López-Herce; Bárbara Fernández; Javier Urbano; Santiago Mencía; Maria José Solana; Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez; Jose María Bellón; Angel Carrillo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Better outcome after pediatric resuscitation is still a dilemma.

Authors:  Sandeep Sahu; Kamal Kishore; Indu Lata
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-07

6.  The authors reply.

Authors:  Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert M Sutton; Michael Dean; Murray Pollack
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Factors associated with mortality in pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective multicenter multinational observational study.

Authors:  Jesús López-Herce; Jimena Del Castillo; Martha Matamoros; Sonia Cañadas; Ana Rodriguez-Calvo; Corrado Cecchetti; Antonio Rodriguez-Núñez; Angel Carrillo Alvarez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Characteristics and outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospitalised African children.

Authors:  A Olotu; M Ndiritu; M Ismael; S Mohammed; S Mithwani; K Maitland; C R J C Newton
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Independent Risk Factors for Sepsis-Associated Cardiac Arrest in Patients with Septic Shock.

Authors:  Won Soek Yang; Youn-Jung Kim; Seung Mok Ryoo; Won Young Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Acute-phase reactants after paediatric cardiac arrest. Procalcitonin as marker of immediate outcome.

Authors:  Marta Los Arcos; Corsino Rey; Andrés Concha; Alberto Medina; Belen Prieto
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.