Literature DB >> 16989874

Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.

Greig de Zubicaray1, Katie McMahon, Mathew Eastburn, Alan J Pringle, Lina Lorenz, Michael S Humphreys.   

Abstract

Cued recall and item recognition are considered the standard episodic memory retrieval tasks. However, only the neural correlates of the latter have been studied in detail with fMRI. Using an event-related fMRI experimental design that permits spoken responses, we tested hypotheses from an auto-associative model of cued recall and item recognition [Chappell, M., & Humphreys, M. S. (1994). An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations: Analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall. Psychological Review, 101, 103-128]. In brief, the model assumes that cues elicit a network of phonological short term memory (STM) and semantic long term memory (LTM) representations distributed throughout the neocortex as patterns of sparse activations. This information is transferred to the hippocampus which converges upon the item closest to a stored pattern and outputs a response. Word pairs were learned from a study list, with one member of the pair serving as the cue at test. Unstudied words were also intermingled at test in order to provide an analogue of yes/no recognition tasks. Compared to incorrectly rejected studied items (misses) and correctly rejected (CR) unstudied items, correctly recalled items (hits) elicited increased responses in the left hippocampus and neocortical regions including the left inferior prefrontal cortex (LIPC), left mid lateral temporal cortex and inferior parietal cortex, consistent with predictions from the model. This network was very similar to that observed in yes/no recognition studies, supporting proposals that cued recall and item recognition involve common rather than separate mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16989874     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  7 in total

1.  Overlap between the neural correlates of cued recall and source memory: evidence for a generic recollection network?

Authors:  Hiroki R Hayama; Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of evidence from a dual-process perspective.

Authors:  Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Episodic retrieval and the cortical binding of relational activity.

Authors:  Arthur P Shimamura
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Tracking cognitive change over 24 weeks with longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Donald G McLaren; Aishwarya Sreenivasan; Eli L Diamond; Meghan B Mitchell; Koene R A Van Dijk; Amy N Deluca; Jacqueline L O'Brien; Dorene M Rentz; Reisa A Sperling; Alireza Atri
Journal:  Neurodegener Dis       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.977

5.  Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement: an fMRI study of the testing effect.

Authors:  Erik A Wing; Elizabeth J Marsh; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Towards an understanding of parietal mnemonic processes: some conceptual guideposts.

Authors:  Daniel A Levy
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-04

7.  The time course of episodic associative retrieval: electrophysiological correlates of cued recall of unimodal and crossmodal pair-associate learning.

Authors:  Roni Tibon; Daniel A Levy
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.