Literature DB >> 16989548

Inducing letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers.

Daniel Fiset1, Frédéric Gosselin, Caroline Blais, Martin Arguin.   

Abstract

Letter-by-letter (LBL) dyslexia is an acquired reading disorder characterized by very slow reading and a large linear word length effect. This suggests the use of a sequential LBL strategy, in sharp contrast with the parallel letter processing used by normal subjects. Recently, we have proposed that the reading difficulty of LBL dyslexics is due to a deficit in discriminating visually similar letters based on parallel letter processing [Arguin, M., Fiset, S., & Bub, D. Sequential and parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 535-555, 2002]. The visual mechanisms underlying this deficit and the LBL strategy, however, are still unknown. In this article, we propose that LBL dyslexic patients have lost the ability to use, for parallel letter processing, the optimal spatial frequency band for letter and word recognition. We claim that, instead, they rely on lower spatial frequencies for parallel processing, that these lower spatial frequencies produce confusions between visually similar letters, and that the LBL compensatory strategy allows them to extract higher spatial frequencies. The LBL strategy would thus increase the spatial resolution of the visual system, effectively resolving the issue pertaining to between-letter similarity. In Experiments 1 and 2, we succeeded in replicating the main features characterizing LBL dyslexia by having normal individuals read low-contrast, high-pass-filtered words. Experiment 3, conducted in LBL dyslexic L.H., shows that, indeed, the letter confusability effect is based on low spatial frequencies, whereas this effect was not supported by high spatial frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16989548     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  The left occipitotemporal cortex does not show preferential activity for words.

Authors:  Alecia C Vogel; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Stroke disconnectome decodes reading networks.

Authors:  Michel Thiebaut de Schotten; Isabelle Hesling; Stephanie J Forkel; Loïc Labache; Parashkev Nachev
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Processing deficits for familiar and novel faces in patients with left posterior fusiform lesions.

Authors:  Daniel J Roberts; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Esther Kim; Marie-Josephe Tainturier; Pelagie M Beeson; Steven Z Rapcsak; Anna M Woollams
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Too little, too late: reduced visual span and speed characterize pure alexia.

Authors:  Randi Starrfelt; Thomas Habekost; Alexander P Leff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Efficient visual object and word recognition relies on high spatial frequency coding in the left posterior fusiform gyrus: evidence from a case-series of patients with ventral occipito-temporal cortex damage.

Authors:  Daniel J Roberts; Anna M Woollams; Esther Kim; Pelagie M Beeson; Steven Z Rapcsak; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Intact reading in patients with profound early visual dysfunction.

Authors:  Keir X X Yong; Jason D Warren; Elizabeth K Warrington; Sebastian J Crutch
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  What's in a name? The characterization of pure alexia.

Authors:  Randi Starrfelt; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.