Literature DB >> 16988647

Gastrointestinal tolerance of erythritol and xylitol ingested in a liquid.

D Storey1, A Lee, F Bornet, F Brouns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine and compare the gastrointestinal (GI) responses of young adults following consumption of 45 g sucrose, 20, 35 and 50 g xylitol or erythritol given as a single oral, bolus dose in a liquid.
DESIGN: The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
SUBJECTS: Seventy healthy adult volunteers aged 18-24 years were recruited from the student population of the University of Salford. Sixty-four subjects completed the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects consumed at home without supervision and in random order, either 45 g sucrose or 20, 35 and 50 g erythritol or xylitol in water on individual test days, while maintaining their normal diet. Test days were separated by 7-day washout periods. Subjects reported the prevalence and magnitude of flatulence, borborygmi, bloating, colic, bowel movements and the passage of faeces of an abnormally watery consistency.
RESULTS: Compared with 45 g sucrose, consumption of a single oral, bolus dose of 50 g xylitol in water significantly increased the number of subjects reporting nausea (P<0.01), bloating (P<0.05), borborygmi (P<0.005), colic (P<0.05), watery faeces (P<0.05) and total bowel movement frequency (P<0.01). Also 35 g of xylitol increased significantly bowel movement frequency to pass watery faeces (P<0.05). In contrast, 50 g erythritol only significantly increased the number of subjects reporting nausea (P<0.01) and borborygmi (P<0.05). Lower doses of 20 and 35 g erythritol did not provoke a significant increase in GI symptoms. At all levels of intake, xylitol produced significantly more watery faeces than erythritol: resp. 50 g xylitol vs 35 g erythritol (P<0.001), 50 g xylitol vs 20 g erythritol (P<0.001) and 35 g xylitol vs 20 g erythritol (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: When consumed in water, 35 and 50 g xylitol was associated with significant intestinal symptom scores and watery faeces, compared to the sucrose control, whereas at all levels studied erythritol scored significantly less symptoms. Consumption of 20 and 35 g erythritol by healthy volunteers, in a liquid, is tolerated well, without any symptoms. At the highest level of erythritol intake (50 g), only a significant increase in borborygmi and nausea was observed, whereas xylitol intake at this level induced a significant increase in watery faeces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16988647     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  23 in total

1.  Erythritol reduces small intestinal glucose absorption, increases muscle glucose uptake, improves glucose metabolic enzymes activities and increases expression of Glut-4 and IRS-1 in type 2 diabetic rats.

Authors:  Chika Ifeanyi Chukwuma; Ramgopal Mopuri; Savania Nagiah; Anil Amichund Chuturgoon; Md Shahidul Islam
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Baking quality, sensory properties and shelf life of bread with polyols.

Authors:  Suresh Bhise; A Kaur
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Gastrointestinal tolerance of erythritol-containing beverage in young children: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E Jacqz-Aigrain; B Kassai; C Cornu; J-M Cazaubiel; B Housez; M Cazaubiel; J-M Prével; M Bell; A Boileau; P de Cock
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  Suitability of sugar alcohols as antidiabetic supplements: A review.

Authors:  Nontokozo Z Msomi; Ochuko L Erukainure; Md Shahidul Islam
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.157

5.  A Practical Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Bloating and Distension.

Authors:  David J Cangemi; Brian E Lacy
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2022-02

6.  Assessment of isomalt for colon-specific delivery and its comparison with lactulose.

Authors:  Mohamed Hassan G Dehghan; V Rama Mohan Gupta; Shaikh Mohammed Asif; Yusrida Darwis; Mohammad Rizwan; Veenu Piyush Mundada
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Non-Nutritive Polyol Sweeteners Differ in Insecticidal Activity When Ingested by Adult Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae).

Authors:  Sean O'Donnell; Kaitlin Baudier; Daniel R Marenda
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.857

Review 8.  Gastrointestinal Disturbances Associated with the Consumption of Sugar Alcohols with Special Consideration of Xylitol: Scientific Review and Instructions for Dentists and Other Health-Care Professionals.

Authors:  Kauko K Mäkinen
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-10-20

9.  Gastric emptying of solutions containing the natural sweetener erythritol and effects on gut hormone secretion in humans: A pilot dose-ranging study.

Authors:  Bettina K Wölnerhanssen; Jürgen Drewe; Wout Verbeure; Carel W le Roux; Ludmilla Dellatorre-Teixeira; Jens F Rehfeld; Jens J Holst; Bolette Hartmann; Jan Tack; Ralph Peterli; Christoph Beglinger; Anne C Meyer-Gerspach
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 6.577

10.  Erythritol, a non-nutritive sugar alcohol sweetener and the main component of truvia®, is a palatable ingested insecticide.

Authors:  Kaitlin M Baudier; Simon D Kaschock-Marenda; Nirali Patel; Katherine L Diangelus; Sean O'Donnell; Daniel R Marenda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.