Literature DB >> 16988317

Results of streamlined regional ambulance transport and subsequent treatment of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms.

J W Haveman1, A Karliczek, E L G Verhoeven, I F J Tielliu, R de Vos, J H Zwaveling, J J A M van den Dungen, C J Zeebregts, M W N Nijsten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the triage of patients operated for non-ruptured and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) before the endovascular era.
DESIGN: Retrospective single-centre cohort study.
METHODS: All patients treated for an acute AAA between 1998 and 2001 and admitted to our hospital were evaluated in the emergency department for urgent AAA surgery. All time intervals, from the telephone call from the patient to the ambulance department, to the arrival of the patient in the operating theatre, were analysed. Intraoperative, hospital and 1-year survival were determined.
RESULTS: 160 patients with an acute AAA were transported to our hospital. Mean (SD) age was 71 (8) years, and 138 (86%) were men. 34 (21%) of these patients had symptomatic, non-ruptured AAA (sAAA) and 126 patients had ruptured AAA (rAAA). All patients with sAAA and 98% of patients with rAAA were operated upon. For the patients with rAAA, median time from telephone call to arrival at the hospital was 43 min (interquartile range 33-53 min) and median time from arrival at the hospital to arrival at the operating room was 25 min (interquartile range 11-50 min). Intraoperative mortality was 0% for sAAA and 11% for rAAA (p = 0.042), and hospital mortality was 12% and 33%, respectively (p = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary unified strategy resulted in a rapid throughput of patients with acute AAA. Rapid transport, diagnosis and surgery resulted in favourable hospital mortality. Despite the fact that nearly all the patients were operated upon, survival was favourable compared with published data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16988317      PMCID: PMC2579610          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2006.037879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  25 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  M J Bown; A J Sutton; P R F Bell; R D Sayers
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Community and hospital outcome from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm within the catchment area of a regional vascular surgical service.

Authors:  D J Adam; I V Mohan; W P Stuart; M Bain; A W Bradbury
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; John A Cowan; James C Stanley; Peter K Henke; Peter J Pronovost; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jun 25-Jul 1       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Monique Prinssen; Eric L G Verhoeven; Jaap Buth; Philippe W M Cuypers; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Ron Balm; Erik Buskens; Diederick E Grobbee; Jan D Blankensteijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a well-defined geographic area.

Authors:  M Heikkinen; J-P Salenius; O Auvinen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Predictors of repair and effect of gender on treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Andrew D Dueck; K Wayne Johnston; David Alter; Andreas Laupacis; Daryl S Kucey
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  R M Greenhalgh; L C Brown; G P S Kwong; J T Powell; S G Thompson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Sep 4-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Long-term survival and temporal trends in patient and surgeon factors after elective and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  Andrew D Dueck; Daryl S Kucey; K W Wayne Johnston; David Alter; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Factors determining survival after ruptured aortic aneurysm: the hospital, the surgeon, and the patient.

Authors:  K Ouriel; K Geary; R M Green; W Fiore; J E Geary; J A DeWeese
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  4 in total

1.  Changes in laboratory values and their relationship with time after rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Jan W Haveman; Clark J Zeebregts; Eric L G Verhoeven; P van den Berg; Jan J A M van den Dungen; Jan H Zwaveling; Maarten W N Nijsten
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Changes in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture and short-term mortality, 1995-2008: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Rodney P Bensley; Kristina A Giles; Rob Hurks; A James Oʼmalley; Philip Cotterill; Elliot Chaikof; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Transfer of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm from general hospitals to specialist vascular centres: results of a Delphi consensus study.

Authors:  Robert J Hinchliffe; Tamsin Ribbons; Pinar Ulug; Janet T Powell
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Improving the outcomes from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: interdisciplinary best practice guidelines.

Authors:  R J Hinchliffe; J T Powell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.