AIM: To investigate the relationship between optic disc area and axial length in normal eyes of white and black people. METHODS: Consecutive eligible normal subjects were enrolled. Ocular biometry was obtained using A-scan ultrasonography, and reliable images of the optic disc were obtained using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. The relationship between optic disc area and axial length was assessed using univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: 281 eyes of 281 subjects were enrolled. Black subjects (n = 157) had significantly larger discs (mean (SD) disc area, 2.12 (0.5) mm(2)) than white subjects (n = 124; 1.97 (0.6) mm(2); t test, p = 0.02). Optic disc area increased with axial length (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.13, p<0.035) for the entire study population. Multivariate regression models including race, disc area and axial length showed that a significant but weak linear relationship exists between axial length and disc area (partial correlation coefficient 0.14; p<0.024), and with race and disc area (partial correlation coefficient 0.19; p<0.017) when adjusted for the effects of other terms in the model. CONCLUSION: Increased disc area is associated with longer axial length measurements and African ancestry. This may have implications for pathophysiology and risk assessment of glaucoma.
AIM: To investigate the relationship between optic disc area and axial length in normal eyes of white and black people. METHODS: Consecutive eligible normal subjects were enrolled. Ocular biometry was obtained using A-scan ultrasonography, and reliable images of the optic disc were obtained using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. The relationship between optic disc area and axial length was assessed using univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: 281 eyes of 281 subjects were enrolled. Black subjects (n = 157) had significantly larger discs (mean (SD) disc area, 2.12 (0.5) mm(2)) than white subjects (n = 124; 1.97 (0.6) mm(2); t test, p = 0.02). Optic disc area increased with axial length (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.13, p<0.035) for the entire study population. Multivariate regression models including race, disc area and axial length showed that a significant but weak linear relationship exists between axial length and disc area (partial correlation coefficient 0.14; p<0.024), and with race and disc area (partial correlation coefficient 0.19; p<0.017) when adjusted for the effects of other terms in the model. CONCLUSION: Increased disc area is associated with longer axial length measurements and African ancestry. This may have implications for pathophysiology and risk assessment of glaucoma.
Authors: David A Atchison; Catherine E Jones; Katrina L Schmid; Nicola Pritchard; James M Pope; Wendy E Strugnell; Robyn A Riley Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Charles C Berry; Amanda R Smith; Keri A Dirkes; Anne L Coleman; Jody R Piltz-Seymour; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Gary Trick; James D Brandt; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2004-01
Authors: Astra Dinculescu; Jackie Estreicher; Juan C Zenteno; Tomas S Aleman; Sharon B Schwartz; Wei Chieh Huang; Alejandro J Roman; Alexander Sumaroka; Qiuhong Li; Wen-Tao Deng; Seok-Hong Min; Vince A Chiodo; Andy Neeley; Xuan Liu; Xinhua Shu; Margarita Matias-Florentino; Beatriz Buentello-Volante; Sanford L Boye; Artur V Cideciyan; William W Hauswirth; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: Grace M Richter; Xinbo Zhang; Ou Tan; Brian A Francis; Vikas Chopra; David S Greenfield; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; David Huang Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Ying Geng; Kenneth P Greenberg; Robert Wolfe; Daniel C Gray; Jennifer J Hunter; Alfredo Dubra; John G Flannery; David R Williams; Jason Porter Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Nimesh B Patel; Mimi Lim; Avni Gajjar; Kelsey B Evans; Ronald S Harwerth Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Michael I Seider; Roland Y Lee; Dandan Wang; Melike Pekmezci; Travis C Porco; Shan C Lin Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2009 Oct-Nov Impact factor: 2.503