Literature DB >> 16987367

Oscillometric brachial mean artery pressures are higher than intra-radial mean artery pressures in intensive care unit patients receiving norepinephrine.

M Pytte1, K Dybwik, J Sexton, B Straume, E Waage Nielsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine is frequently used in intensive care unit (ICU) patients to raise and maintain an adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP). Conflict arises as to which MAP should guide vasopressor dose, as oscillometric MAP in the brachial artery often diverges from intra-radial MAP. We wanted to estimate the magnitude of this difference in ICU patients receiving norepinephrine, and to see whether the patient age, norepinephrine dose, age of radial catheter, ventilation treatment or severity of illness influenced the difference.
METHODS: Prospective observational study comparing oscillometric MAP and intra-radial MAP performed in a central hospital-based surgical ICU during the period from February 2002 through to October 2003. Sixty-eight consecutive patients who received a norepinephrine infusion to maintain MAP above 70 mmHg were included. The mean arterial blood pressure was measured both oscillometrically and in the ipsilateral radial artery.
RESULTS: Oscillometric MAP was on average 6.6 mmHg higher (95% CI 5.3-7.9) than intra-radial MAP in the 134 sets of measurements (P < 0.001). The patient's age (P = 0.319), norepinephrine dosage (P = 0.959) the age of the radial catheter (P = 0.992) were not significant. The difference in MAP was marginally greater in ventilated patients (P = 0.061) and significantly greater as the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) score increased (P = 0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: MAP measured oscillometrically over the brachial artery directly in the radial artery gave different results in an ICU population receiving norepinephrine. In more than one of four patients this difference is so large, and increases with illness severity, that the selection of any one method would influence treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16987367     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01045.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  7 in total

1.  Noninvasive continuous beat-to-beat radial artery pressure via TL-200 applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Ron Dueck; Oliver Goedje; Paul Clopton
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Photoplethysmographic characterization of vascular tone mediated changes in arterial pressure: an observational study.

Authors:  Gerardo Tusman; Cecilia M Acosta; Sven Pulletz; Stephan H Böhm; Adriana Scandurra; Jorge Martinez Arca; Matías Madorno; Fernando Suarez Sipmann
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Evaluation and management of elevated blood pressures in hospitalized children.

Authors:  Abanti Chaudhuri; Scott M Sutherland
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Correlation of Noninvasive Blood Pressure and Invasive Intra-arterial Blood Pressure in Patients Treated with Vasoactive Medications in a Neurocritical Care Unit.

Authors:  Ali A Saherwala; Sonja E Stutzman; Mohamed Osman; Junaid Kalia; Stephen A Figueroa; DaiWai M Olson; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Methods of blood pressure measurement in the ICU.

Authors:  Li-wei H Lehman; Mohammed Saeed; Daniel Talmor; Roger Mark; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Accuracy of invasive arterial pressure monitoring in cardiovascular patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Stefano Romagnoli; Zaccaria Ricci; Diego Quattrone; Lorenzo Tofani; Omar Tujjar; Gianluca Villa; Salvatore M Romano; A Raffaele De Gaudio
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Synthetic photoplethysmography (PPG) of the radial artery through parallelized Monte Carlo and its correlation to body mass index (BMI).

Authors:  Tananant Boonya-Ananta; Andres J Rodriguez; Ajmal Ajmal; Vinh Nguyen Du Le; Anders K Hansen; Joshua D Hutcheson; Jessica C Ramella-Roman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.