Literature DB >> 16986149

The prevalence and special educational requirements of dyscompetent physicians.

Betsy W Williams1.   

Abstract

Underperformance among physicians is not well studied or defined; yet, the identification and remediation of physicians who are not performing up to acceptable standards is central to quality care and patient safety. Methods for estimating the prevalence of dyscompetence include evaluating available data on medical errors, malpractice claims, disciplinary actions, quality control studies, medical record review studies, and in-stream assessments of physician performance. These data provide a range of estimates from 0.6% to 50%, depending on the method. A reasonable estimate of dyscompetence appears to be 6% to 12%. Age-related cognitive decline, impairment due to substance use disorders, and other psychiatric illness can contribute to underperformance, diminishing physicians' insight into their level of performance as well as their ability to benefit from an educational experience.Currently, dyscompetent physicians in the United States are identified through either the legal system or peer review. The primary method of resolving issues of underperformance in physicians is through continuing medical education (CME). Although a number of specialized assessment and education programs exist in the United States, these programs are largely underutilized. Similar programs exist in Canada and have provided evidence of the efficacy of a more specialized and individualized educational approach for underperforming physicians. Current specialty programs focused on this population employ individual assessments of knowledge and performance, individually designed educational programs, long-term plans for maintenance of educational activity, and repeated assessment of performance level. Noting that few CME programs offer these requirements, a number of changes to current medical quality assurance programs that might foster such educational requirements for underperforming physicians are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16986149     DOI: 10.1002/chp.68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of remediation programs in pharmacy and other health professions.

Authors:  David F Maize; Stephen H Fuller; Philip M Hritcko; Rae R Matsumoto; Denise A Soltis; Reza R Taheri; Wendy Duncan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Effects of continuing professional development on clinical performance: results of a study involving family practitioners in Quebec.

Authors:  François Goulet; Eveline Hudon; Robert Gagnon; Eliane Gauvin; Francine Lemire; Isabelle Arsenault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Certainty and safe consequence responses provide additional information from multiple choice question assessments.

Authors:  M J Tweed; S Stein; T J Wilkinson; G Purdie; J Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Qualitative evaluation of an educational intervention to reduce medicolegal risks for medical doctors experiencing significantly more cases than their peers in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  John Jolly; Paul Bowie; Julie Price; Matt Mason; Mark Dinwoodie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  A case for revisiting peer review: Implications for professional self-regulation and quality improvement.

Authors:  Terry E Hill; Peter F Martelli; Julie H Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Importance of neuropsychological screening in physicians referred for performance concerns.

Authors:  Betsy White Williams; Philip Flanders; Dillon Welindt; Michael V Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A retrospective study of cognitive function in doctors and dentists with suspected performance problems: an unsuspected but significant concern.

Authors:  Neha Kataria; Nick Brown; Pauline McAvoy; Azeem Majeed; Martin Rhodes
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2014-04-09

8.  Professional Support, London: the professional development unit supporting practitioner well-being, refreshment, remediation and revalidation.

Authors:  Julia Whiteman; Penny Morris; Helen Halpern
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2013-05-17

9.  Assessment of fitness for duty of underperforming physicians: The importance of using appropriate norms.

Authors:  Betsy White Williams; Philip Flanders; Elizabeth S Grace; Elizabeth Korinek; Dillon Welindt; Michael V Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Multifaceted Organizational Physician Assessment Program: Validity Evidence and Implications for the Use of Performance Data.

Authors:  Andrea N Leep Hunderfund; Yoon Soo Park; Frederic W Hafferty; Kelly M Nowicki; Steven I Altchuler; Darcy A Reed
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-07-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.