Literature DB >> 16985892

A review of surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy.

Herbert Lepor.   

Abstract

Since the early 20th century, radical prostatectomy has been used in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, before the widespread acceptance of prostate-specific antigen screening, the majority of cancers were clinically advanced and not amenable to cure, so relatively few men were candidates for this procedure. Modern advances have contributed dramatically to the reduction of complications and morbidity associated with radical prostatectomy. As a result, the procedure has become the most common treatment selected by men with localized prostate cancer. This article reviews several issues regarding radical prostatectomy, including surgical techniques, cancer control, intraoperative localization of the cavernous nerves, patient selection, and laparoscopic versus robotic approaches.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16985892      PMCID: PMC1477597     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  18 in total

Review 1.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  H Lepor
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  The role of perineural invasion and other biopsy characteristics as prognostic markers for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  J I Epstein
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  1998-08

3.  Temporal trends in rates of prostate cancer: declining incidence of advanced stage disease, 1974 to 1994.

Authors:  L M Newcomer; J L Stanford; B A Blumenstein; M K Brawer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention.

Authors:  P C Walsh; P J Donker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Is the percentage of cancer in biopsy cores predictive of extracapsular disease in T1-T2 prostate carcinoma?

Authors:  V Ravery; H P Schmid; M Toublanc; L Boccon-Gibod
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy: an independent predictor of final pathologic stage.

Authors:  A de la Taille; A Katz; E Bagiella; C A Olsson; K M O'Toole; M A Rubin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Radical perineal prostatectomy for clinical stage B2 carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  J S Elder; H J Jewett; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The role of radical prostatectomy in the management of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P C Walsh; H Lepor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location.

Authors:  Joseph A Pettus; Christopher J Weight; Clinton J Thompson; Richard G Middleton; Robert A Stephenson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations.

Authors:  P C Walsh; H Lepor; J C Eggleston
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  17 in total

1.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

2.  Assessment of change in prostate volume and shape following surgical resection through co-registration of in-vivo MRI and fresh specimen ex-vivo MRI.

Authors:  C Orczyk; S S Taneja; H Rusinek; A B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Real-time, label-free, intraoperative visualization of peripheral nerves and micro-vasculatures using multimodal optical imaging techniques.

Authors:  Jaepyeong Cha; Aline Broch; Scott Mudge; Kihoon Kim; Jung-Man Namgoong; Eugene Oh; Peter Kim
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Prostatectomies for localized prostate cancer: a mixed comparison network and cumulative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kannan Sridharan; Gowri Sivaramakrishnan
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-02-23

Review 5.  Pharmacological Treatment of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: What is the Evidence?

Authors:  Anja Løvvik; Stig Müller; Hitendra R H Patel
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  New techniques and management options for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joycelyn L Speight; Mack Roach
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

7.  Nerve spectroscopy: understanding peripheral nerve autofluorescence through photodynamics.

Authors:  Fernando Dip; Rene Aleman; Mariano Socolovsky; Nerina Villalba; Jorge Falco; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Kevin P White; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Strategies to improve cost effectiveness of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in emerging economies.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Caicedo; Jessica Santander; Alejandra Taborda; Camilo Medina; Laura Zuluaga; Carlos Gustavo Trujillo; Catalina Barco- Castillo; Darío Londoño Trujillo; Mauricio Plata
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 9.  A Bright Future for Precision Medicine: Advances in Fluorescent Chemical Probe Design and Their Clinical Application.

Authors:  Megan Garland; Joshua J Yim; Matthew Bogyo
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 8.116

10.  Postoperative patient comfort in suprapubic drainage versus transurethral catheterization following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nina Harke; Michael Godes; Jawid Habibzada; Katarina Urbanova; Christian Wagner; Henrik Zecha; Mustapha Addali; Jorn H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.